2013 IEEE 39th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/pvsc.2013.6744274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy model validation for large-scale photovoltaic systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimal solar PV parameters for Glasgow were determined through an inter-model comparison [ 34 ] with PVsyst, a commercial tool used widely in industry due to its accuracy [ 74 ]. This comparison involved GOMap's solar PV model and the PVsyst model calculating the potential annual energy output for a single 2 m × 1 m monocrystalline PV panel in Glasgow city for varying panel tilt angles, from 0 o to 90 o at an azimuth angle of 180 o with the exclusion of horizon brightening as this component required a paid license for PVsyst.…”
Section: Gomap Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal solar PV parameters for Glasgow were determined through an inter-model comparison [ 34 ] with PVsyst, a commercial tool used widely in industry due to its accuracy [ 74 ]. This comparison involved GOMap's solar PV model and the PVsyst model calculating the potential annual energy output for a single 2 m × 1 m monocrystalline PV panel in Glasgow city for varying panel tilt angles, from 0 o to 90 o at an azimuth angle of 180 o with the exclusion of horizon brightening as this component required a paid license for PVsyst.…”
Section: Gomap Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outputs were PV array energy production, performance ratios, normalized power production and PV energy losses. The software has been extensively used and validated by different researchers for PV power output simulation studies (Westbrook and Collins, 2013;Gurupira and Rix, 2017;Sadeq and Abdellatif, 2021;Jagadale et al, 2022;Milosavljević et al, 2022;Yakubu et al, 2022;PVsyst, 2023).…”
Section: Simulation Of Pv Energy Outputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where is the daily energy required from the battery, DOD is the permissible depth of discharge, AD is autonomy days, is the ampere-hour efficiency of the battery cell, and is the selected nominal DC voltage of the battery block [2,10]. The values of the factors considered while calculating for battery size are battery loss 0.85, 4-days of autonomy, depths of discharge, DOD -0.8, and battery's nominal voltage.…”
Section: Photovoltaic Component Sizingmentioning
confidence: 99%