2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11207-021-01805-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Partition in Four Confined Circular-Ribbon Flares

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the first time, we find that for the same peak X-ray flux confined flares have higher mean peak reconnection rates than eruptive flares (see Figure 5(C)). This together with the fact that HXR (or microwave) emissions are temporally correlated with the global (see Qiu & Cheng 2022 and references therein) and local reconnection rates (Temmer et al 2007;Naus et al 2022), implies that large, eruptive flares are less efficient in particle acceleration than confined flares, in agreement with direct particle measurements (see, e.g., Thalmann et al 2015;Cai et al 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the first time, we find that for the same peak X-ray flux confined flares have higher mean peak reconnection rates than eruptive flares (see Figure 5(C)). This together with the fact that HXR (or microwave) emissions are temporally correlated with the global (see Qiu & Cheng 2022 and references therein) and local reconnection rates (Temmer et al 2007;Naus et al 2022), implies that large, eruptive flares are less efficient in particle acceleration than confined flares, in agreement with direct particle measurements (see, e.g., Thalmann et al 2015;Cai et al 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…They also found that confined flares are efficient particle accelerators; however, the energies to which electrons are accelerated in confined flares are lower (and do not produce HXR above 300 keV, indicating the lack of efficient acceleration of electrons to high energies), in agreement with Thalmann et al (2015). Cai et al (2021) analyzed energy partition in four confined flares. They found that the ratio of nonthermal energies to magnetic energies is significantly larger for confined than for eruptive flares, ranging within E nth /E mag ≈ 0.7-0.76, in agreement with the case study by Thalmann et al (2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…It is revealed that the energy partitions in two flares are similar, and the heating requirement consisting of the peak thermal energy and radiative loss could sufficiently be supplied by the nonthermal energy. Furthermore, Cai et al (2021) investigated four confined CFs in detail, finding that the values of energy components increase systematically with flare classes. The ratio of nonthermal energy to magnetic free energy may provide a key factor for discriminating confined flares from eruptive ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, an eruptive flare is characterized by the appearance of two ribbons on both sides of the PIL that spread apart with time as observed in Hα images and at other wavelengths. They have large-scale hot postflare loops observed in SXR and are of long duration (e.g., tens of minutes to a few hours), whereas a confined flare occurs in a relatively compact region and lasts for a short period (e.g., less than an hour) (Kushwaha et al 2014;Cai et al 2021). Although infrequent, even some large X-class flares have been found to belong to the confined category (Green et al 2002;Wang & Zhang 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%