2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy penalty reduction in the calcium looping cycle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
96
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A high energy input is necessary to increase the input stream temperature up to the value required for the endothermic calcination reaction to occur at a sufficiently fast rate, which is essentially determined by the composition of the gas in the calcination environment [24,25] . Once sensible heat from the CaO and CO 2 streams at the calciner outlet is recovered, these products are stored at ambient temperature for their use afterwards as a function of demand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A high energy input is necessary to increase the input stream temperature up to the value required for the endothermic calcination reaction to occur at a sufficiently fast rate, which is essentially determined by the composition of the gas in the calcination environment [24,25] . Once sensible heat from the CaO and CO 2 streams at the calciner outlet is recovered, these products are stored at ambient temperature for their use afterwards as a function of demand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under these conditions, limestone derived CaO exhibits a severe drop of conversion in only a few cycles converging towards a residual value of just about 0.07, which makes it necessary to periodically purge the poorly active sorbent and replace it by a makeup flow of fresh limestone. The efficiency of the calciner reactor and the energy penalty efficiency caused by the CaL integration [32,33] into coal fired power plants (CFPP) have been also important subjects of analysis [25,[34][35][36]. Pilot plants (of size on the order of 1-2 MWth) demonstrate the achievement of CO 2 capture efficiencies around 90% [37,38] whereas model simulations predict an efficiency penalty on power generation around 5-6% when scaling up the technology to a commercial level [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are inherent thermodynamic advantages to this process, compared to other post-combustion CCS technologies, and a number of researchers have determined that this process imposes an efficiency penalty on a power station significantly lower than that imposed by either oxyfuel combustion or MEA scrubbing, at 6-8% points, as opposed to 10 -12 points for the latter technologies. (Romeo et al, 2010, Lin et al, 2011, Daval et al, 2011, Martinez et al, 2012 One issue which has received significant attention during previous research is that the ability of CaO produced from natural limestone reduces significantly (from ~ 0.7 mol CO2/mol CaO) when it is first used to capture CO2 to a significantly lower level (~0.1 mol CO2/mol CaO) after 30 cycles of calcination and carbonation (Fennell et al, 2007a, Blamey et al, 2010a) (hereafter, the number of moles of CO2 reacted per mole of CaO will be referred to as the carrying capacity of the limestone) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abanades (2002) carries out a similar analysis (later expanded by Grasa et al 2009, Rodriguez et al 2010and Martínez et al 2012) for a carbonation-calcination loop and computes the asymptotic value of absorption capacity for an infinite number of cy. Instead, average age is here computed for any finite N ; the asymptotic behavior is then obtained.…”
Section: Agementioning
confidence: 99%