2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Performance Certification: Misassessment due to assuming default heat losses

Abstract: Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs) are issued when dwellings are constructed, sold or leased in the EU. Where the cost of obtaining the required data is prohibitive, EPC assessors use nationally applicable default-values. To ensure that dwellings are not assigned a wrongly-higher EPC rating, a standardised thermal bridging transmittance coefficient (Y-value) is typically adopted for all existing dwellings while worst-case overall heat loss coefficients (U-values) are used. Default U-values are applied to a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Low-performance and inefficient buildings are usually occupied by people with low incomes, suffering from fuel poverty [33] and facing financial difficulties that prohibit them from paying for the energy that is necessary to maintain a proper IEQ or for an energy renovation of their dwelling. Similar deviations were also observed in Irish houses, with actual energy savings of −22% for low-performance dwellings and even reaching up to −70% for high (very good) performance dwellings [34]. In the Netherlands, low-performance dwellings have much lower energy use, while the ones with high performance have a low energy use higher than calculated [35].…”
Section: Occupant Behaviorsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Low-performance and inefficient buildings are usually occupied by people with low incomes, suffering from fuel poverty [33] and facing financial difficulties that prohibit them from paying for the energy that is necessary to maintain a proper IEQ or for an energy renovation of their dwelling. Similar deviations were also observed in Irish houses, with actual energy savings of −22% for low-performance dwellings and even reaching up to −70% for high (very good) performance dwellings [34]. In the Netherlands, low-performance dwellings have much lower energy use, while the ones with high performance have a low energy use higher than calculated [35].…”
Section: Occupant Behaviorsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The authors analysed 1172 buildings for which both simulated and measured consumptions were known, and they found a gap of − 23% in the energy performance of building (pre-retrofitted); this gap became positive (2%) for buildings that had been renovated. Ahern and Norton (2020) performed a similar analysis and found that, for Ireland's single-family housing, the adoption of thermal default values (U-values) underestimated the energy performance of about 90% of the dwellings. The authors introduced a methodology, based on an Irish EPC database that is able to assess a realistic energy savings, after building retrofitting, using default U-values.…”
Section: Research Background and Gapmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Energy Performance Certificates (EPC) provide important building-stock-related information not considered in the census but EPC data have flaws. For example, Ahern and Norton [11] concluded that models overestimate primary energy up to 70% by using default values for unknown parameters. In addition, Dall'O et al [12] found 24% EPC with unreliable information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%