Energy Poverty and Life Satisfaction: Structural Mechanisms and Their Implications

Abstract

This paper investigates the distinct mechanisms through which energy poverty is linked to life satisfaction, via health status and one’s satisfaction with one’s own socioeconomic status, using data from the Life in Transition survey. Our sample contains 19,598 individuals from 11 former communist states located in Central and Eastern Europe, and two developed countries for comparison. We estimated a partial least squared–path model and found that both health status and socioeconomic status are relevant mediators. Our results also indicate that gender moderates the relation between health status and life satisfaction. Energy poverty has a low contribution to health status but a larger contribution to satisfaction with socioeconomic status, thus indicating that interventions on energy poverty may not greatly improve the level of health, but can have an influence on how people feel about their life. The contribution of our paper is twofold. On the one side, we continue to consolidate the existing link between energy poverty and self-reported health status with a new focus on the Central and Eastern European countries; on another side, we propose a theoretical framework expansion by including totally novel factors to be analyzed in this context: satisfaction with socioeconomic status, economic environment improvement, and intolerance.

Analysis of Energy Poverty in 7 Latin American Countries Using Multidimensional Energy Poverty Index

“…The distance between two occurrences of a particular word occurring in the text of an abstract was compared to the standard deviation of all Appendix A. 4…”

“…The UN Agenda acknowledges the role of energy access in the fulfilment of different Sustainable Development Goals [3], however, due to its complexity and the several aspects that involves, defining energy poverty is not an easy task [4] and there is no agreement on what energy poverty means [5]. Seeking to have a general understanding of the concept, the World Energy Assessment defined energy poverty as the absence of sufficient choice in accessing adequate, affordable, reliable, high-quality, safe, and environmentally benign energy services to support economic and human development [1].…”

Energy Poverty in European Union: Assessment Difficulties, Effects on the Quality of Life, Mitigation Measures. Some Evidences from Romania

“…The problem could be approached in a multidimensional way, considering the numerous consequences of energy poverty (or the inverse phenomenon, of energy wealth) on the quality of life or on the pollution of the environment. Studies from international literature [27,33,34] have drawn attention to the negative consequences of energy poverty on the health status of the population, the researchers observing an indirect relation between access to energy and winter mortality, heart and respiratory diseases. In addition, the consequences extend to the quality of life.…”

How Does Clean Energy Consumption Affect Women’s Health: New Insights from China

“…Improved indoor and outdoor environmental quality can reduce disease generation and transmission, thereby enhancing women's health [18]. At the same time, the use of clean energy reduces gender inequality [19], educational inequality [20], and household vulnerability [21] and significantly increases women's life satisfaction and well-being [22], thus improving women's disease prevention and health awareness [23]. Stable electricity supply and long-term household use of electricity can promote cleaner household energy, thereby reducing women's health vulnerability [24].…”