2015 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshop 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ipdpsw.2015.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Prediction of OpenMP Applications Using Random Forest Modeling Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These decision trees are aggregated into a random forest ensemble that combines their input. Then, results are aggregated, so it can outperform any individual decision tree's output [13].…”
Section: B Performance Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These decision trees are aggregated into a random forest ensemble that combines their input. Then, results are aggregated, so it can outperform any individual decision tree's output [13].…”
Section: B Performance Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, authors in [13], [14] assign an average current/power cost to every opcode in the target ISA and applies it to the execution trace of the program to estimate the energy consumption. The authors of [7] combine performance counters values (monitored during the application run) and a random forests model for predicting the energy consumed by parallel OpenMP applications.…”
Section: Energy Estimation From Source Codementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these techniques have never focused on energy, nor they targeted ultra-low-power embedded architectures. From the other side, previous research work investigated power and energy modelling of parallel architectures using features extracted from code execution profiling [7], [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An energy prediction mechanism for OpenMP applications using a Random Forest Modeling (RFM) approach in compilers is proposed in (BENEDICT et al, 2015).…”
Section: Approaches With No Runtime Adaptation and No Transparency Tomentioning
confidence: 99%