Energy Prices, Pass-Through, and Incidence in U.S. Manufacturing

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in Bonn is a local and virtual international research center and a place of communication between science, politics and business. IZA is an independent nonprofit organization supported by Deutsche Post Foundation. The center is associated with the University of Bonn and offers a stimulating research environment through its international network, workshops and conferences, data service, project support, research visits and doctoral program. IZA engages in (i) original and internationally competitive research in all fields of labor economics, (ii) development of policy concepts, and (iii) dissemination of research results and concepts to the interested public. Terms of use: Documents in D I S C U S S I O N P A P E R S E R I EIZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author. This paper studies how increases in energy input costs for production are split between consumers and producers via changes in product prices (i.e., pass-through). We show that in markets characterized by imperfect competition, marginal cost pass-through, a demand elasticity, and a price-cost markup are sufficient to characterize the relative change in welfare between producers and consumers due to a change in input costs. We find that increases in energy prices lead to higher plant-level marginal costs and output prices but lower markups. This suggests that marginal cost pass-through is incomplete, with estimates centered around 0.7. Our confidence intervals reject both zero pass-through and complete pass-through. We find heterogeneous incidence of changes in input prices across industries, with consumers bearing a smaller share of the burden than standards methods suggest.JEL Classification: L11, H22, H23, Q40, Q54

Why is Pollution from U.S. Manufacturing Declining? The Roles of Environmental Regulation, Productivity, and Trade

“…The smallest elasticity of 2.89 is for the Medical, Precision, and Optical Products sector, which has fairly di↵erentiated products. These correspond to markups of between 14 and 53 percent, which fits the range from other published studies, which for U.S. manufacturing industries typically range from 10 to 50 percent (Hall, 1986;Martins, Scarpetta, and Pilat, 1996;Ganapati, Shapiro, and Walker, 2016).…”

“…While this implies that their measures of the gains from trade are closely related, these structures do not always obtain the kind of tractable closedform relationships we use here (Melitz and Ottaviano, 2008;Feenstra and Weinstein, 2017;Arkolakis, Costinot, Donaldson, and Rodriguez-Clare, Forthcoming We assume this market structure for several reasons. Many industries like cement and steel that have substantial pollution emissions are also concentrated and have barriers to entry (Ganapati, Shapiro, and Walker, 2016). By accounting for fixed entry costs and sector-specific markups, our assumptions reflect a stylized version of polluting sectors.…”

The international elasticity puzzle is worse than you think

“…3 An alternative for marginal cost shocks would be to use exchange rate shocks for intermediate imported inputs such as Piveteau & Smagghue (2015) and Loecker & Biesebroeck (2016). Ganapati, Shapiro & Walker (2016) use energy cost shocks as instruments for marginal cost shocks. Their aim, very different from ours, is to estimate the pass-through of those shocks into domestic prices.…”

Transforming Energy Sector Impact for Supporting Climate Change Mitigation: The Case of Pakistan

“…Self-reliance on energy reduces the economy's vulnerability and otherwise, it causes shortages in the commodity market by lowering production (Luft, 2012). Another significantly important aspect, that is, high cost of production due to costly electricity solutions (Ganapati et al, 2016) (in case if the focus is demandsupply gap only and not the cost-effective solution) results in less competitiveness in the global market to lowering the foreign exchange earnings and the employment level in the economy (Valasai et al, 2017). The frequency and duration of power cut are also directly affected by available infrastructure, exogenous shocks to the economy, and weather conditions (Parker and Kirkpatrick, 2012).…”