2014
DOI: 10.5771/0042-059x-2014-2-154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Reference Forecast and Energy Policy Targets for Germany

Abstract: Based on international studies and a market forecast of probable energy industry development a reference scenario up to the year 2030 has been developed for Germany, complemented by a trend scenario extending out to the year 2050. Because most of the targets of the German energy concept will not (fully) be achieved in the reference and trend scenario, an additional target scenario is developed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Misconel et al [30] compare three frameworks, ELTRAMOD [45], PowerACE [46], IDILES-JMM [47,48], applying them on the German power sector and using a quantitative approach for the outcomes comparison based on the direct comparison of the following indicators: generation and demand, installed capacities of generation sources, installed capacities of storage and transmission units, hourly generation and storage profiles, and CO 2 emissions. Ruhnau et al [49] compare five electricity market models: PowerFlex [50], the Joint market model [51], SCOPE [52,53], EMMA [54] and the DIMENSION model [55]. The authors use a quantitative approach based on direct comparison of the following indicators: costs, generation and demand, CO 2 emissions.…”
Section: Comparison Of Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Misconel et al [30] compare three frameworks, ELTRAMOD [45], PowerACE [46], IDILES-JMM [47,48], applying them on the German power sector and using a quantitative approach for the outcomes comparison based on the direct comparison of the following indicators: generation and demand, installed capacities of generation sources, installed capacities of storage and transmission units, hourly generation and storage profiles, and CO 2 emissions. Ruhnau et al [49] compare five electricity market models: PowerFlex [50], the Joint market model [51], SCOPE [52,53], EMMA [54] and the DIMENSION model [55]. The authors use a quantitative approach based on direct comparison of the following indicators: costs, generation and demand, CO 2 emissions.…”
Section: Comparison Of Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%