2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.04.086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy saving of side-column DWCs for quaternary separation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cost of recovery of VFAs from the fermented VFA feed was determined by considering equipment investment and utility costs. The cost evaluation followed the procedure used in the previous studies [50, 51]. For updating the investment cost, the Marshall & Swift Cost Index, 1593.7 in 2017, was used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost of recovery of VFAs from the fermented VFA feed was determined by considering equipment investment and utility costs. The cost evaluation followed the procedure used in the previous studies [50, 51]. For updating the investment cost, the Marshall & Swift Cost Index, 1593.7 in 2017, was used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The investment cost was computed using the equations given in Refs. [26][27][28] with Marshall & Swift cost index of 1593.7 in 2017. The payout time of the investment was three years, and the annual number of operating days was 300.…”
Section: Process Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total tray number in the columns is similarly matched to the conventional CDU, only without the strippers. The general structure of the two‐column setup is similar to a side‐stripper DWC , however, this structure cannot be built as a DWC due to the unbalanced interlinking streams between the two columns. The column operating pressure was set 0.13 MPa lower than the conventional column for increased efficiency.…”
Section: Process Designmentioning
confidence: 99%