2019 23rd International Conference on System Theory, Control and Computing (ICSTCC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icstcc.2019.8886055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Shaping Control for Robotic Needle Insertion

Abstract: This work investigates the use of energy shaping control to reduce deflection in slender beams with tip load and actuation at the base. The ultimate goal of this research is a buckling avoidance strategy for robotic-assisted needle insertion. To this end, the rigid-link model of a flexible beam actuated at the base and subject to tip load is proposed, and an energy shaping approach is employed to construct a nonlinear controller that accounts for external forces. A comparative simulation study highlights the b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(76 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two nonlinear control laws are designed, and a direct physical interpretation is provided in terms of mechanical energy of the closed-loop system. The controllers extend our preliminary work [24] by including an adaptive observer designed with the Immersion and Invariance methodology [25,26] to compensate the unknown friction forces of the pneumatic actuator 2. The corresponding stability conditions are studied with a Lyapunov approach and tuning guidelines for the controller parameters are discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two nonlinear control laws are designed, and a direct physical interpretation is provided in terms of mechanical energy of the closed-loop system. The controllers extend our preliminary work [24] by including an adaptive observer designed with the Immersion and Invariance methodology [25,26] to compensate the unknown friction forces of the pneumatic actuator 2. The corresponding stability conditions are studied with a Lyapunov approach and tuning guidelines for the controller parameters are discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This scenario is valuable from a theoretical point of view, but it is not necessarily clinically representative. Figure 5 shows that setting = 0, which corresponds to our preliminary work without friction compensation [24], the actuator friction is not compensated and the regulation goal is not achieved even though no lateral force is present. In particular, with Controller 1 the piston position stops at approximately 75 mm, while with Controller 2 the piston does not move at all employing the current tuning = 20.…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%