2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.07.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy sorghum biomass harvest thresholds and tillage effects on soil organic carbon and bulk density

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
3
32
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Companion management practices that enhanced system biomass inputs (e.g., increased fertilizer N rates, cover crop use) tended to ameliorate negative soil impacts of stover removal. Using a processbased crop model developed by USDA-ARS in Temple, TX called the Agricultural Land Management Alternatives with Numerical Assessment Criteria (ALMANAC) [103], model simulations with ALMANAC for biomass sorghum predicted that even when SOC levels were maintained under optimal residue and soil management practices (i.e., 75 % removal under no-till), soil physical properties (i.e., bulk density) still experienced degradation [104].…”
Section: System Sustainability and Climate Change Mitigation Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Companion management practices that enhanced system biomass inputs (e.g., increased fertilizer N rates, cover crop use) tended to ameliorate negative soil impacts of stover removal. Using a processbased crop model developed by USDA-ARS in Temple, TX called the Agricultural Land Management Alternatives with Numerical Assessment Criteria (ALMANAC) [103], model simulations with ALMANAC for biomass sorghum predicted that even when SOC levels were maintained under optimal residue and soil management practices (i.e., 75 % removal under no-till), soil physical properties (i.e., bulk density) still experienced degradation [104].…”
Section: System Sustainability and Climate Change Mitigation Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reduced or no-tillage, planting of winter cover crops, and establishment of vegetative barriers are conservation practices that show great promise for reducing soil erosion and increasing soil organic carbon [10,[23][24][25][26]. Described in detail by English et al [27], these three conservation practices can have significant impacts on farmer-perceived costs of residue removal, soil erosion, and ultimately their likelihood of participating in biomass supply programs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A manutenção de resíduos vegetais em superfície e ausência de revolvimento do solo promove maior retenção de nutrientes, como o K, cálcio (Ca) e magnésio (Mg), e pode atuar como reservatório de nitrogênio (N), fósforo (P) e enxofre (S), capaz de suprir parte das necessidades da cultura durante seu ciclo (CALEGARI, 2004). Segundo Meki et al (2013), a remoção a longo prazo da palhada sobre o solo resultou em rendimentos reduzidos de biomassa total ao longo do tempo devido ao esgota-mento de nutrientes que poderia ser atribuído à mineralização reduzida, às perdas e talvez imobilização do nitrogênio (N).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified