2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.116813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy storage system based on transcritical CO2 cycles and geological storage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is followed by electrochemical energy systems, batteries, with a discharge capacity limited to about 40 MW [132,133], at a development level ranging from TRL 9 to systems whose prototype or components have been tested in relevant environments (TRL 5). At a lower level of development but with a discharge capacity similar to that of thermal systems [134,135], are thermochemical systems, where the technology components have only been tested at the laboratory level (TRL 3-4). In terms of efficiency, mechanical systems would range from 60-80% [136,137], followed by 50-90% for thermal systems [138].…”
Section: Caesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is followed by electrochemical energy systems, batteries, with a discharge capacity limited to about 40 MW [132,133], at a development level ranging from TRL 9 to systems whose prototype or components have been tested in relevant environments (TRL 5). At a lower level of development but with a discharge capacity similar to that of thermal systems [134,135], are thermochemical systems, where the technology components have only been tested at the laboratory level (TRL 3-4). In terms of efficiency, mechanical systems would range from 60-80% [136,137], followed by 50-90% for thermal systems [138].…”
Section: Caesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional geothermal systems that use H 2 O for the transmission of heat suffer from the drawback of fluid loss that has a significant negative economic effect. Dense-phase CO 2 has thermal characteristics that allow it to transfer large quantities of heat, while at the same time having better physical characteristics (e.g., lower viscosity, higher compressibility, and expansibility). , Therefore, CO 2 has been considered for utilization in the process of geothermal energy by extracting heat from the ground. Such a process combines heat recovery from the subsurface, while the working fluid (e.g., CO 2 ) losses can be considered as a part of CCS. In this way, value is added to the heat recovery process instead of considering it a financial loss, as occurs when using H 2 O as the working fluid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%