2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2014.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy structure, energy policy, and economic sustainable development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One possibility might be to tax fossil fuels (effectively a carbon tax), so that the price of energy from renewables and nuclear power became competitive [38]. As consumers consistently resist tax increases, a finding supported by this study, the revenue raised from a new tax could be rebated, so that the net effect was no increase in energy cost to the consumer.…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Implicationssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…One possibility might be to tax fossil fuels (effectively a carbon tax), so that the price of energy from renewables and nuclear power became competitive [38]. As consumers consistently resist tax increases, a finding supported by this study, the revenue raised from a new tax could be rebated, so that the net effect was no increase in energy cost to the consumer.…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Implicationssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Sustainable development is indeed a complex phenomenon, which makes it particularly difficult to compare and assess the progress of EU Member States in achieving its objectives (Grzebyk and Stec, 2015). In the literature, we will mainly find research on the analysis of various issues related to sustainable economic development of countries, including the works of Brown (2011), Imran et al (2014), Chen et al (2014) and others. Although there are different indicators and rankings to measure and monitor progress on sustainability at the macro level, the benefits for stakeholders and policy makers are still limited due to the lack of predictive models (Pérez-Ortiz et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%