2008
DOI: 10.1080/00137910802482287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Technology Learning Through Deployment in Competitive Markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The operations of the learning system are assumed to be determined by features, events and processes (FEPs) in the system environment. Contrary to earlier proposals, the cybernetic approach (Wene, 2007(Wene, , 2008a(Wene, , 2008b(Wene, , 2010 considers technology learning as inherent property of the learning system. Experience and learning curves express the eigenbehaviour (Varela, 1979(Varela, , 1984von Förster, 1984von Förster, , 1993 of an operationally closed system producing for a competitive market but acting autonomously based on its internal structure.…”
Section: The Cybernetic Approachmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The operations of the learning system are assumed to be determined by features, events and processes (FEPs) in the system environment. Contrary to earlier proposals, the cybernetic approach (Wene, 2007(Wene, , 2008a(Wene, , 2008b(Wene, , 2010 considers technology learning as inherent property of the learning system. Experience and learning curves express the eigenbehaviour (Varela, 1979(Varela, , 1984von Förster, 1984von Förster, , 1993 of an operationally closed system producing for a competitive market but acting autonomously based on its internal structure.…”
Section: The Cybernetic Approachmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…These differences must be explained within the theory in order to make confident extrapolations of experience and learning curves. Wene (2008bWene ( , 2010 discusses causes for the differences and his arguments are briefly recapitulated here together with some new observations. The three distributions are fitted assuming the same strength, S FEP , and Table I shows that the relation between positive and negative perturbations are about the same for all three sets of learning systems and technologies.…”
Section: Empirical Support From Compilations Of Learning Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Many authors argue that differences in market structure can affect the actual costs of a technology by, for example, influencing a company's internal efficiency [10] or the level of innovation within an industry [11]. Specifically, it is sometimes argued that technological learning requires competitive markets [12,13], although this view is not shared universally by the theoretical and empirical literature on the relationship between an industry's degree of competition and its level of innovation [14,15]. It should be noted that there is no dispute that the market structure and the respective level of competition has an effect on market prices.…”
Section: Factors Influencing the Market Costs Of Electricity Generatimentioning
confidence: 99%