Energy-to-Mass Ratio—A Novel Selection Criterion of Pneumatic Motors Used for the Actuation of Wearable Assistive Devices

Abstract

The requirements to be met by a wearable assistive device are compactness, lightweight and energy efficiency. While the literature discusses the construction and performance of such devices, no information is provided as to the criteria to be applied in selecting such an actuator, capable of satisfying the mentioned conditions. Ensuring the high autonomy of a wearable assistive device requires actuators that can store a large quantity of energy in a small as possible volume, for example, actuators with a high energy density. This paper presents a comparative study of the performance of two types of pneumatic actuators: single-acting cylinders and pneumatic muscles, respectively, and offers information that will enable users to select an optimum solution. The quality indicators considered in conducting the comparative study are size, mass, the developed force and the energy-to-mass ratio. A method is proposed to determine the energy developed by the motors over the entire stroke; based on that, the energy-to-mass ratio is subsequently calculated. This indicator is a valuable tool made available to designers of wearable assistive devices. The conclusion yielded by the study asserts that while pneumatic muscles have larger radial and axial dimensions, they present benefits as to the developed forces and the energy-to-mass ratios.

3D‐Printed Phase‐Change Artificial Muscles with Autonomous Vibration Control

“…[13][14][15] One of the most popular soft actuators is pneumatic actuator, which can provide a high force-to-weight ratio by adjusting the pressure inside the actuator chamber. [16] In addition, this actuator can provide variable stiffness when the chamber pressure is changed. Figure 1a shows a pneumatic chamber in a low and high-pressure situation, respectively.…”

A new type of bladeless turbine for compressed gas energy storage system

“…However, the pneumatic motor needs regular maintenance and low energy efficiency (less than 65%). Therefore, there are still many restrictions on the use of pneumatic motors ( Stoianovici et al, 2007 ; Tanaka et al, 2013 ; Deaconescu and Deaconescu, 2022 ).…”

Special Issue on Exoskeleton Robotic Systems

“…In this collection of Special Issue articles, there is also one [5] which proposes a new selection criterion for linear pneumatic motors used to drive wearable assistive devices, namely, the energy-to-mass ratio. The requirements for a wearable assistive device are compactness, lightweightness, and energy efficiency.…”