McEvoy's Handbook of Photovoltaics 2018
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-809921-6.00017-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Yield in Photovoltaic Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The polycrystalline silicon (poly‐c‐Si) PV module was installed in an open‐field mounting structure at the GI OTF, and it is rated at 220 W p nominal power. The test PV system at the UCY OTF includes 5 poly‐c‐Si PV modules (rated at 205 W p ) that were connected in series to form a string of nominal power capacity 1.025 kW p at the input of a string inverter 28 . The PV system is installed in an open‐field mounting arrangement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The polycrystalline silicon (poly‐c‐Si) PV module was installed in an open‐field mounting structure at the GI OTF, and it is rated at 220 W p nominal power. The test PV system at the UCY OTF includes 5 poly‐c‐Si PV modules (rated at 205 W p ) that were connected in series to form a string of nominal power capacity 1.025 kW p at the input of a string inverter 28 . The PV system is installed in an open‐field mounting arrangement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test PV system at the UCY OTF includes 5 poly-c-Si PV modules (rated at 205 W p ) that were connected in series to form a string of nominal power capacity 1.025 kW p at the input of a string inverter. 28 The PV system is installed in an open-field mounting arrangement.…”
Section: Experimental Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously stated, after the clear-sky conditions were confirmed and the correlation windows were determined, the estimation difference values for each panel (ED 2 , ED 3 , and ED 4 ) were calculated, using expressions (4), (2), and (3), respectively. As stated in Section 3.2, linear regression analysis was used, as the parameter b, the slope of the model, was determined using expression (9). The input data for the linear regression analysis were time-series of estimated difference ED 3 values for time intervals t 1 = 12:30-12:40; t 2 = 12:40-12:50; t 3 = 12:50-13:00; t 4 = 13:00-13:10 for a period of ten consecutive days, only involving detected clear-sky condition.…”
Section: Detection Of Soiling Degradation Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although normalized to cover a 25-year lifetime, these patterns could represent early life degradation modes such as light and elevated induced degradation (LeTID) [39], light induced degradation [40], and Staebler-Wronski [41] effects. Such types of degradation exhibit various time scales from a number of hours to years [4,5,22].…”
Section: Soiling and Degradation Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%