2020
DOI: 10.3390/app10082676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enforcing a Force–Displacement Curve of a Nonlinear Structure Using Topology Optimization with Slope Constraints

Abstract: The objective of this study is to develop an optimization methodology to find a layout that traces a prescribed force–displacement curve through a topology optimization approach. To this end, we propose an objective function to minimize the difference between a prescribed force–displacement curve and the curve calculated at each iteration of the optimization process. Slope constraints are introduced to solve issues encountered when using a small number of target points. In addition, a projection filter is empl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mass reduction here of the Hollow Plate, L-Bracket, and MBB-Beam were 96.9%, 97.3%, and 99.1%, respectively. In addition, the highest mass reduction in the PO workflow could be achieved at process (7) with 95%, 93.4%, and 97.7% mass saving in the three cases. Finally, the dominant process in the TO workflow was process (3) with 74.1%, 62.5%, and 88.8% mass reduction.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Three Applied Design Workflowsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mass reduction here of the Hollow Plate, L-Bracket, and MBB-Beam were 96.9%, 97.3%, and 99.1%, respectively. In addition, the highest mass reduction in the PO workflow could be achieved at process (7) with 95%, 93.4%, and 97.7% mass saving in the three cases. Finally, the dominant process in the TO workflow was process (3) with 74.1%, 62.5%, and 88.8% mass reduction.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Three Applied Design Workflowsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…A plethora of research papers focused on either development of new approaches or improvement of the existing optimization methods [7,8]. However, there is limited literature that compares the aforementioned optimization methods or possible combinations of them with respect to their results and optimization time [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The desired stiffness was obtained by 3D-printing or CNC-machining this profile with a shape that approximately corresponds to the elastic potential energy of the proposed stiffness characteristic. Others have proposed a topology optimized 3D-printed beam, but have only realized slightly hardening spring characteristics [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a powerful computational design methodology, topology optimization has demonstrated its great po-optimization has been adopted in many studies to design novel microstructures with engineered properties, such as negative Poisson's ratio [1,2], negative thermal expansion coefficient [14], tunable elastic modulus [7,8] and stress-strain relations [1,2], photonic and phononic bandgap [15,16], and improved piezoelectric properties [17]. At the structure level, topology optimization has been adopted to program unconventional force-displacement responses, including programming the snap-through [18] and hardening/softening responses of slender structures [19] and controlling the force-displacement path of compliant mechanisms [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%