2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2011.05.111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enforcing energy, helicity and strong mass conservation in finite element computations for incompressible Navier–Stokes simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compute with ..P 3 / 3 , P d isc 2 / Scott Vogelius (SV) elements on a barycenter refined tetrahedralization of the domain, via the method of [30], and a uniform time step of D 0.025 is used to compute the solutions up to end-time T D 10. Of the three, the VQ-based filter appears to resolve it best; a zoomed in look at the streamribbons near the step in Figure 11 shows a more refined picture of its eddy separation and matches the solution of [31] qualitatively well. For the direct numerical simulation of this problem that was performed in [31], the total spatial DOFs needed to resolve this flow was 1,282,920.…”
Section: D Channel Flow Over a Forward-backward Stepmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We compute with ..P 3 / 3 , P d isc 2 / Scott Vogelius (SV) elements on a barycenter refined tetrahedralization of the domain, via the method of [30], and a uniform time step of D 0.025 is used to compute the solutions up to end-time T D 10. Of the three, the VQ-based filter appears to resolve it best; a zoomed in look at the streamribbons near the step in Figure 11 shows a more refined picture of its eddy separation and matches the solution of [31] qualitatively well. For the direct numerical simulation of this problem that was performed in [31], the total spatial DOFs needed to resolve this flow was 1,282,920.…”
Section: D Channel Flow Over a Forward-backward Stepmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This problem is a 3D analog of the 2D step problem presented previously, and a diagram of the flow domain is given in Figure 9; the channel is 10 40 10 with a 10 1 1 block on the bottom of the channel, five units in from the inlet. This flow was studied in [31], and the correct behavior at T D 10 is for an eddy to have detached from behind the step and moved down the channel and a new eddy to form. An inflow=outflow condition is enforced, and the initial condition is the solution of the Re D 50 steady flow.…”
Section: D Channel Flow Over a Forward-backward Stepmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We use instead a quartic inflow profile, given below by (3.13), and for simplicity also enforce this condition at the outlet. The correct physical behavior for this flow problem, which was resolved by Cousins et al [7], is that by T ¼ 10, an eddy forms behind the step, detaches and moves into the flow, and another eddy forms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The [2] considered two kinds of two-level stabilized finite element methods based on local Gauss integral technique for the two-dimensional stationary Navier-Stokes equations approximated by the lowest equal-order elements which do not satisfy the inf-sup condition. A finite element scheme for the 3D Navier-Stokes equations (NSE) through the use of Scott-Vogelius elements [3], enforces point wise the solenoidal constraints for velocity and vorticity. Tavelli and Dumbser proposed a new spatially high order accurate semi-implicit discontinuous Galerkin (DG) method for the solution of the two dimensional incompressible Navier-Stokes equations on staggered unstructured curved meshes [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%