Engaged acclimatization: Towards responsible community‐based participatory research in Nunavut

Abstract

In this article, we consider the formation of responsible research relationships with Inuit communities from an “outsider” researcher perspective. Cautious not to prescribe what counts as responsible, we draw on research experiences in several Nunavut communities to introduce and explain “engaged acclimatization.” This neologism refers to embodied and relational methodological processes for fostering responsible research partnerships, and is inspired by the significance of preliminary fieldwork in orienting the lead author's doctoral thesis. As a complement to community‐based participatory methodologies, engaged acclimatization facilitates endogenous research by enacting ethics as a lived experience, initiating and nurturing relationships as a central component of research, and centring methods on circumstances within participating communities. After we locate engaged acclimatization within resonant literature and details of interrelated research projects, our article sketches out four aspects of engaged acclimatization: crafting relations, learning, immersion, and activism. In our discussion of each, we integrate specific insights derived from field notes, observations, photographs, critical reflections, and literature that have brought us to this understanding. The four aspects provide conceptual and methodological tools for readers to apply in the contexts of their own research programs or in guidelines for establishing partnerships with Inuit or Aboriginal communities. The value of this article lies in the extent to which it encourages readers to situate engaged acclimatization in their own research and further develop it as a process.

Indigenous Research Methods: A Systematic Review

“…Logistical needs within CBPR involve creation of a research team or research partnerships such as development of a research advisory board, determination of roles within the project, such as project leaderships, and developing research standards (Velasquez, Knatterud-Hubinger, Narr, Mendenhall, & Solheim, 2011). Such processes have been described as engaged acclimatization, which was documented as crafting relations, learning, immersion, and activism (Grimwood, Doubleday, Ljubicic, Donaldson, & Blangy, 2012). This communication is fundamental within a CPBR approach; however, critical issues about authorship or acknowledgement within community-based research have been inconsistently applied (Castleden, Morgan, & Neimanis, 2010).…”

Illuminating traces: enactments of responsibility in practices of Arctic river tourists and inhabitants

“…Learning and feedback from this preliminary fieldwork informed subsequent research visits (May, July and November 2010, October 2011); for example, study objectives and methods were adapted to better reflect community interests (i.e. the intrinsic purpose), a local research assistant was identified, and strategies for effectively engaging with Inuit participants and organisations were clarified (Grimwood, Doubleday, Ljubicic, Donaldson, & Blangy, 2012). It was during research visits that Baker Lake residents whom at some point in their lifetimes had directly experienced, lived and/or travelled the Thelon, contributed as participants in the methods described below.…”

An argument for ethical physical geography research on Indigenous landscapes in Canada

“…A substantial change from TCPS to TCPS2 was the addition of Chapter 9, which is specifically dedicated to the ethics of research involving Indigenous peoples in Canada (CIHR et al ). Chapter 9 was a constant reference in last year's (2012) Summer Issue of The Canadian Geographer (56:2) (Castleden et al , ; Grimwood et al ; Koster et al ), which focused on Indigenous community‐based participatory research in Canadian geography. The special issue included accounts of the progress made and challenges faced by geographers responding to the ethical requirements of research involving Indigenous peoples in Canada.…”