2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-62056-1_29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engagement and Mind Perception Within Human-Robot Interaction: A Comparison Between Elderly and Young Adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in line with previous findings showing that people are likely to ascribe human attributes to a robot possessing human‐like characteristics and behavior (Krach et al., 2008; Thellman, Silvervarg, & Ziemke, 2020; Zhao, Cusimano, & Malle, 2016). However, the finding is in contrast with studies that show older adults are more likely to ascribe human characteristics to a robot partner than younger adults (Alimardani & Qurashi, 2019; Kont & Alimardani, 2020; Pak, Crumley‐Branyon, Visser, & Rovira, 2020). Future studies can further explore how different characteristics of the artificial agent varying in human‐likeness affect processing and how these outcomes compare to human–human interactions.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…This is in line with previous findings showing that people are likely to ascribe human attributes to a robot possessing human‐like characteristics and behavior (Krach et al., 2008; Thellman, Silvervarg, & Ziemke, 2020; Zhao, Cusimano, & Malle, 2016). However, the finding is in contrast with studies that show older adults are more likely to ascribe human characteristics to a robot partner than younger adults (Alimardani & Qurashi, 2019; Kont & Alimardani, 2020; Pak, Crumley‐Branyon, Visser, & Rovira, 2020). Future studies can further explore how different characteristics of the artificial agent varying in human‐likeness affect processing and how these outcomes compare to human–human interactions.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…The underlying assumption is that while the analysis of everyday life focuses on the third-person perspective (when looking at "lifeworlds"), investigation of lived experiences always involves firstperson accounts. Both approaches suit HRI studies that involve mixed methods research, from behavioural and observational measurements [e.g., (Siegel et al, 2009;Kont and Alimardani, 2020)], to tools designed for subjective evaluations and measures of the robot performance and interaction [e.g., (Siegel et al, 2009;Winkle et al, 2019;Hannibal et al, 2022)].…”
Section: The Everyday and Lived Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ensures activities that minimize sedentariness [35]. Prior studies have shown that the reported engagement of older adults with robots is generally lower than the younger adults [36]. Effort is therefore made to actively engage the older adults with the robot during interaction.…”
Section: Interaction Design Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%