1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0005-7967(98)00149-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engagement and outcome in the treatment of bulimia nervosa: first phase of a sequential design comparing motivation enhancement therapy and cognitive behavioural therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
197
3
7

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 222 publications
(218 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
11
197
3
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This study compared the treatments of MET and cogni tive-behavioural therapy in patients with bulimia nervosa (Treasure et al, 1999). The study randomly assigned 125 patients to one of the two treatments.…”
Section: I0 Motivational Enhancement Therapy With Eating Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study compared the treatments of MET and cogni tive-behavioural therapy in patients with bulimia nervosa (Treasure et al, 1999). The study randomly assigned 125 patients to one of the two treatments.…”
Section: I0 Motivational Enhancement Therapy With Eating Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] Encouraging results have also been reported for interventions in diabetes, obesity, physical activity, hypertension, eating disorders and other psychiatric illnesses, pain, cardiac rehabilitation, and fruit and vegetable intake. 7,[37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] In the MI approach, patients' perceived importance of change in selfcare and perceived self-efficacy are seen as key constructs underpinning their degree of motivation (or readiness) to change their health behavior.…”
Section: Self-care Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[133][134][135] The main points of criticism focus on the definition and measurement of the proposed stages, the processes that are proposed to facilitate the progression through the stages and the lack of evidence from prospective studies to support the theory's predictions. [136][137][138] In spite of the criticisms of the TTM, there is face validity for its clinical usefulness as it is a construct that is easily measured and understood by patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%