2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10460-008-9113-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engagement for transformation: Value webs for local food system development

Abstract: Engagement happens when academics and nonacademics form partnerships to create mutual understanding, and then take action together.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This diversity of viewpoints, however, is not necessarily a detriment to any emergent coalition. If a coalition can form with principles of inclusion and equity, it can generate significant value and have potentially greater leverage in effecting food system change (Block et al, 2008;Carolan, 2006). Our study provides some initial insights into these issues and potentially identifies some critical areas where thinking about mechanisms for cross-scalar change may need to be enhanced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This diversity of viewpoints, however, is not necessarily a detriment to any emergent coalition. If a coalition can form with principles of inclusion and equity, it can generate significant value and have potentially greater leverage in effecting food system change (Block et al, 2008;Carolan, 2006). Our study provides some initial insights into these issues and potentially identifies some critical areas where thinking about mechanisms for cross-scalar change may need to be enhanced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The IAD places less emphasis on belief structures, but acknowledges the influence of the attributes of actors who are participating in institutional development: their societal positions (the roles and responsibilities affecting their ability to influ-ence change), their livelihood activities (and thus relationship to others and the resource base) and their world-views (a construct similar to that of "deep core beliefs" in the ACF) (Ostrom, 2011). Both frameworks acknowledge similar elements in policy processes: the attributes and/or values of individuals and communities, the relationship of actors to resources (knowledge and social networks), social location (geophysical and socioeconomic), and the rules and norms that govern interactions (Barthel et al, 2013;Block et al, 2008;Block, Chávez, Allen, & Ramirez , 2012;Born & Purcell, 2006Cairney & Heikkila, 2014Carolan, 2006;Colding et al, 2013;Holloway et at., 2010). We present a composite framework in Figure 1.…”
Section: Setting Thementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…He further extended the concept to suggest a reciprocal, collaborative relationship of scholarship with a public entity that consists of (1) research, teaching, integration, and application scholarships that (2) incorporate the reciprocal practices of civic engagement into the production of knowledge [10]. Such kinds of civic engagement mean more than the transfer of knowledge from universities to the public through outreach activities; they refer to social dynamic concepts, including the learning community, collective intelligence, and knowledge generation [11][12][13].…”
Section: The Scholarship Of Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together with representatives of many of these projects, we published an article outlining ''value webs,'' an extension of the concept of ''value chain,'' but focused particularly on what the role of universities and other large institutions have in helping promote the economy of their surrounding regions in a manner that promotes social justice and environmental sustainability. The concept is that the ''values'' in the web become part of what the university or other entity is attempting to promote, as well as being an important selling point for the products, and that these values are best transferred through equitable partnerships (Block et al 2008). The Chicago project detailed in the value webs article was different from the traditional extension model.…”
Section: Community Public Scholarship and Food Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%