Engaging and staying engaged: a phenomenological study of barriers to equitable access to mental healthcare for people with severe mental disorders in a rural African setting

Abstract

BackgroundIn low-and middle-income countries, integration of mental health into primary care is recommended to reduce the treatment gap. In this study we explored barriers to initial and ongoing engagement of people with severe mental disorders (SMD) in rural Ethiopia after implementing integrated primary mental healthcare services.MethodsA qualitative approach was employed. In-depth interviews were conducted with 50 key informants: service users/caregivers engaged with care (n = 17), non-engagers and their caregivers (n = 10), those who had initiated treatment but disengaged and their caregivers (n = 12) and primary healthcare professionals (n = 11). Two focus group discussions were conducted with community health workers (10 per group). Thematic analysis was used.ResultsMost respondents reported improved access to care, usually equated with medication, and were motivated to remain engaged due to experienced benefits of care. However, four main barriers to engagement emerged. (1) Poverty: resulting in inability to pay for medication and undermining vital social support affected engagement for all respondents. (2) Unreliable medication supplies and lack of second line options for inadequate response or intolerable side-effects. (3) The long-term nature of the illness: expectations of cure, stigma of chronic illness, low awareness about the illness and treatment and declining social support over time. (4) The nature of SMD: difficulty conveying the person when acutely disturbed and no flexibility for proactive outreach or legal frameworks to provide care when patients lacked capacity. In those who never engaged, geographical inaccessibility was an important barrier. Alternative cultural explanations for illness were only mentioned as a barrier only by two of the respondents.ConclusionEconomic interventions may be needed to support ongoing engagement in care for people with SMD. Systems of care for chronic illness need to be strengthened in combination with legal frameworks. Expanded options for affordable and effective medication and psychosocial interventions are required for person-centred care.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12939-017-0657-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Impact of integrated mental health care on food insecurity of households of people with severe mental illness in a rural African district: a community‐based, controlled before–after study

“…The pattern of clinic attendance, which showed repeated engagement and disengagement , may explain the following. In our nested qualitative study, people with SMI reported that they tended to attend when they were unwell and not for maintenance care .…”

“…There was a statistically significant total effect of reduced psychotic symptom severity on level of reported discrimination, with the direct effect close to significance and the indirect effect not statistically significant. In qualitative interviews with community stakeholders during development of the district mental healthcare plan, stigma and discrimination were predicted to reduce when the community witnessed people with SMI show improvement with treatment . Social contact interventions, whereby people gain direct exposure to people with SMI and learn about the treatability of their condition are the most effective means of reducing stigma and discrimination .…”

Participatory action research to pilot a model of mental health service user involvement in an Ethiopian rural primary healthcare setting: study protocol

“…PRIME established a multi-sectoral community health advisory board with representatives from key members of the district leadership (security, gender office, women and youth affairs, religious affairs and education), the community and service users and caregivers, and was chaired by the head of the district health office [82]. The CAB met twice a year to oversee and advise PRIME [83].…”

Global barriers to provision and utilization of mental health services: a systematic scope study

“…It was found that experiencing adverse effects of past treatment, especially related to medications, plays a role as a barrier against service utilization. Low level of awareness of patients about necessity of persistent care and adverse effects of medications are great challenges which discourage them to receive care and decrease adherence to treatment (56,61). Educating patients about treatment choices and their potential side effects is considered as an effective strategy to solve this problem (23).…”

“…Cost of services 17 (13, 19-22, 24, 25, 48, 55, 56, 58, Location, distance and transportation barriers 13 (13, 19-24, 40, 54, 58, 59, 66, 67) Lack of family or social support 8 (19,20,22,55,56,59,63,68) Inappropriate and inflexible services 8 (19,20,56,59,(66)(67)(68)(69) Waiting time/time concerns barriers 7 (19,21,22,54,58,66,68) lack of adequate services 5 (18,23,24,40,68) Insurance-related limitations 4 (18,22,54,55) Separation of services and lack of integration 3 (40, 58,68) Inappropriate…”