Engaging customers in value co-creation or co-destruction online

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to develop a theoretical model to understand co-creation/co-destruction of value through customer engagement in online channels. It also investigates the contributing factors. Design/methodology/approach The qualitative approach uses the critical incidents technique to answer the research questions. The authors identify 350 critical incidents in which customers expressed online customer engagement-induced value co-creation or co-destruction experiences. The factors and resulting propositions are identified through data analysis. Data coding and analysis are facilitated by using MAXQDA 12. Findings Co-creation through positively valenced engagement behaviors may occur when customers are delighted, feel valued, experience reciprocity, receive organizational incentives, are solicited for feedback, can count on service recovery efforts and interact with helpful, empathetic, polite and responsive employees. Co-destruction through negatively valenced engagement behaviors emerges from rude employee behaviors, indifference, confrontation with company representatives, technological failure, the lack of complaint outlets and customers’ desire for revenge. Practical implications Selecting and training employees to be helpful, polite, responsive and empathetic toward online visitors can trigger co-creation. Communication between firms and customers should boost customer approval and delight. Organizations can offer incentives, reliable service delivery and a recovery design to stimulate visitor participation. Soliciting feedback requires sound technological support and direct communication links with visitors. Originality/value This study presents the conditions and framework contributing to the duality of customer engagement-induced co-creation and co-destruction values in online channels from the customer, organizational, employee, service design and technological perspectives. It also addresses how value is co-created or co-destructed through examples.

How to Manage the Online Experience Concerning Transactional and Experimental Customers: Case of E-Fashion Sector

“…Bauer et al (2006) have developed the eTransQual scale, which integrates utilitarian quality and analyzes the dimension of enjoyment (hedonic quality). In addition, other authors investigate different hedonic benefits of a website: emotional benefit (Fassnacht & Koese, 2006), hedonic experience (Nambisan & Watt, 2011;Salehi et al, 2013;Jain, Aagia, & Bagdare, 2017), sensory experience (Pentina et al, 2011), emotional experience and online flow experience (Rose et al, 2012;Zhang et al, 2014;Zhang & Lu, 2018).…”

Moving Toward Collaborative Service Recovery: A Multiactor Orientation

“…Here we argue that a multiactor orientation is crucial in addressing the inherent complexities of service recovery encounters (e.g., Edvardsson et al 2011). Second, these processes are commonly described in terms of single-service encounters (Zhang et al 2018). However, service recovery does not occur in isolation but in a dynamic and emergent environment.…”

Exploring the Role of Service Delivery in Remarkable Tourism Experiences

“…Despite contingency factors in SD, components are significant and correlated according to the results; the most important component is the service staff in agreement with Barnes et al [24]. The first implication will possibly be related to training practices; service providers have to keep in mind that frontline employees directly impact customer service encounters [52]. In fact, Ludwig et al [53] focus future discussions in the field of sustainable delight based on the service triangle, which means including staff.…”