2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engaging in emotional labour when facing customer mistreatment in hospitality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, senior bank employees also reported a higher level of emotional labour than those with intermediate job positions. These findings are in line with the study of Similliduu et al. (2020) that examine the effect of emotional labour in customer mistreatment in the hostel industry.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In addition, senior bank employees also reported a higher level of emotional labour than those with intermediate job positions. These findings are in line with the study of Similliduu et al. (2020) that examine the effect of emotional labour in customer mistreatment in the hostel industry.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…To adhere to these new requirements and guidelines, employees engage in emotional labor, which is defined as “the management of feelings to create a publicly observable facial and bodily display; emotional labor is sold for a wage and therefore has exchange value” (Hochschild, 1983, p. 7). The main premise of emotional labor is that employees observe and regulate their expressions and moods when interacting with consumers during work (Chu et al , 2012; Simillidou et al , 2020). Most emotional labor conceptualization has mainly focused on two strategies for regulating employee emotions as follows: surface acting and deep acting (Chu et al , 2012; Diefendorff et al , 2005; Simillidou et al , 2020).…”
Section: Literature Review and Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the motivation of service employees’ sabotage is related to customer misbehavior and employee stress, so employees resort to sabotage to relieve this stress and restore exhausted emotions [ 47 ]. Service employees who feel burnt out by facing aggressive customer situations engage in surface acting [ 73 ]. In addition, if service employees continuously encounter frustrating situations, they intentionally participate in anti-social behaviors, such as sabotage [ 74 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, nine items for dysfunctional customer behavior and four items for service sabotage were measured on a five-point-Likert-scale, where 1 indicates "rarely" and 5 "all the time" to represent the degree of employees' experience. Emotional exhaustion was measured using five items adopted from Maslach and Jackson [73] and social support was…”
Section: Measurement Itemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation