2010
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2009.177709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engaging Key Stakeholders to Assess and Improve the Professional Preparation of MPH Health Educators

Abstract: Engaging key stakeholders in the program review process yielded important changes to the MPH degree program requirements. Others may consider this approach when undertaking curriculum reviews.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Transition, or capstone, courses 2 are commonly used in diverse disciplines, from nursing 13,14 and public health 15 to engineering, 16 and even poultry science. 17 In medicine, though, the vast majority of studies of transition courses have focused narrowly on specialty-specific clinical competencies, such as surgical or other procedural skills.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transition, or capstone, courses 2 are commonly used in diverse disciplines, from nursing 13,14 and public health 15 to engineering, 16 and even poultry science. 17 In medicine, though, the vast majority of studies of transition courses have focused narrowly on specialty-specific clinical competencies, such as surgical or other procedural skills.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We undertook a process evaluation using a published framework and a logic model that focused on resources, activities and process outcomes (reach, delivery, fidelity and receipt of intervention) 23 . Qualitative data were collected via semi-structured telephone interviews with participants ( n = 24), intervention facilitators ( n = 20) and intervention developers ( n = 7).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soliciting feedback for improvement is an important component of intervention development. This step serves as a feedback loop for evidence-based improvement in public health interventions (Linnan and Steckler, 2002). Although participants demonstrated a sophisticated understanding of the treatment rationale, they did suggest clarifying treatment goals and providing more treatment sessions to address other health concerns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%