1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0836(199807)7:3<124::aid-bse148>3.0.co;2-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engaging the stakeholders: corporate views and current trends

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, it allows better understanding of how stakeholders can put pressure on firms and impact market perceptions. As such, it complements prior studies on stakeholder salience, by focusing on the power to influence the company (Mitchell et al , ; Grafé‐Buckens and Hinton, ; Henriques and Sharma, ; González‐Benito and González‐Benito, ; Bolton and Landells, ) by showing that organized, collective and public stakeholder power can affect investors' decisions and thus corporate financial performance. We also contribute to the social and environmental accounting literature and stakeholder engagement stream (Unerman and Bennett, ; Onkila, ; Boesso et al , ; Dobele et al , ; Rodrigue, ; Amran et al , ; Rodrigue et al , ; Kumar et al , ) by considering a new form of engagement that may have the potential to affect firms' behavior via changing investors' decisions in the stock market.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, it allows better understanding of how stakeholders can put pressure on firms and impact market perceptions. As such, it complements prior studies on stakeholder salience, by focusing on the power to influence the company (Mitchell et al , ; Grafé‐Buckens and Hinton, ; Henriques and Sharma, ; González‐Benito and González‐Benito, ; Bolton and Landells, ) by showing that organized, collective and public stakeholder power can affect investors' decisions and thus corporate financial performance. We also contribute to the social and environmental accounting literature and stakeholder engagement stream (Unerman and Bennett, ; Onkila, ; Boesso et al , ; Dobele et al , ; Rodrigue, ; Amran et al , ; Rodrigue et al , ; Kumar et al , ) by considering a new form of engagement that may have the potential to affect firms' behavior via changing investors' decisions in the stock market.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…While prior literature on stakeholder salience (Mitchell et al , ) has focused on traditional mechanisms for stakeholder power (Grafé‐Buckens and Hinton, ; Henriques and Sharma, ; Dobele et al , ), we argue that SMe represents a novel medium that channels, catalyzes and potentially gives rise to activism. In a world where corporations operate globally, SMe offers a unique platform where fragmented international constituencies can come together and mobilize.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Interaction strategies are implemented in situations where organizations determine their motivation to undertake engagement will be met by providing information to their stakeholders, with minimal input from them. Such a strategy includes the communication of details of CSR-related activities or programs to stakeholders described by Noland and Phillips (2010), as well as informational initiatives described by (Grafé-Buckens & Hinton, 1998). This strategy also resembles the transactional engagement described by Bowen et al (2010).…”
Section: Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interdependences between stakeholder groups, as well as their power and influence, are greatly responsible for pushing or pulling firms' strategies towards sustainable development (see, e.g., Grafé‐Buckens and Hinton, ; Henriques and Sadorsky, ; Harvey and Schaefer, ; Madsen and Ulhoi, ; Onkila, ). In a shareholder oriented business culture, such as the US, shareholders exert more influence over strategic decisions, such as the issuance of a sustainability report, compared with other primary stakeholder groups.…”
Section: Theoretical Foundation and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%