2017
DOI: 10.1002/wat2.1245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engaging with the politics of water governance

Abstract: The goal of the study is to strengthen the analytical purchase of the term water governance and improve the utility of the concept for describing and analyzing actual water distribution processes. We argue this is necessary as most writing on water governance is more concerned with promoting particular politically inspired agendas of what water governance should be than with understanding what it actually is. We believe that water governance at heart is about political choices as to where water should flow; ab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
105
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
105
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…By sharing these examples, we want to propose that empirical attention to the (often messy) details of the everyday sociotechnical arrangements that make water move provides a useful entry-point for a practice-based understanding of water governance. As some of us have argued in more detail elsewhere [2], a practice-based understanding usefully shifts thinking about water governance away from societal orderings that can be assumed (theorized) before an empirical investigation, and therefore, rationally designed and "fixed". Instead, a practice-based understanding takes societal orders, and the governance these assume or produce, as always in-the-making and inherently performative.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By sharing these examples, we want to propose that empirical attention to the (often messy) details of the everyday sociotechnical arrangements that make water move provides a useful entry-point for a practice-based understanding of water governance. As some of us have argued in more detail elsewhere [2], a practice-based understanding usefully shifts thinking about water governance away from societal orderings that can be assumed (theorized) before an empirical investigation, and therefore, rationally designed and "fixed". Instead, a practice-based understanding takes societal orders, and the governance these assume or produce, as always in-the-making and inherently performative.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus portraying Dutch delta planning activities suggests that they have a coherence and stability that those involved in them may find difficult to recognize. As we are showing elsewhere, in the Netherlands itself, ideas about what constitutes the best approach for living in, and dealing with, a delta are continuously changing and subject to debate (Van Buuren, Ellen, and Warner 2016; Zwarteveen et al 2017;Zegwaard et al, 2019). The presentation of the Dutch Delta Approach as a tested solution for helping to achieve resilient and prosperous deltas is, therefore, clearly also a construction specifically invented to help create enthusiasm for Dutch water expertise in other parts of the world.…”
Section: A Changing Context: From Aid To Tradementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an approach departs from understandings and uses of governance as a tool to achieve predefined 'good' outcomes that are centered on predefined normative principles, such as accountability, transparency, participation, inclusiveness, and legitimacy [35]. Rather, it stresses the need for empirically assessing how processes of governing water actually happen-and not how governance should happen-and what the distributional outcomes of such processes are [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%