2021
DOI: 10.1080/18117295.2021.2015894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engendering Students’ Epistemic Agency in a Mathematics Class at a University in South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, their difference should be mathematically sound for solutions to be accepted as mathematically different (Widjaja, 2012). As learners compare and argue their solutions to come up with a mathematically efficient one, they reach a consensus when their discourse lends to a mathematically acceptable solution (Chuene, 2011). Yackel and Cobb (1996) further clarify that:…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, their difference should be mathematically sound for solutions to be accepted as mathematically different (Widjaja, 2012). As learners compare and argue their solutions to come up with a mathematically efficient one, they reach a consensus when their discourse lends to a mathematically acceptable solution (Chuene, 2011). Yackel and Cobb (1996) further clarify that:…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Examples of sociomathematical norms include what counts as a mathematically different, sophisticated, efficient, and elegant solution . Mathematically, what counts as mathematically different is observable in interactions, where learners present different solutions to the same task (Chuene, 2011). However, their difference should be mathematically sound for solutions to be accepted as mathematically different (Widjaja, 2012).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation