SAE Technical Paper Series 1979
DOI: 10.4271/790177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engine Control Optimization Via Nonlinear Programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 This can be accomplished using a purely experimental, or a partially model-based, approach [127], [165]. In both cases, the iterations can be performed using heuristics based on experience with previous engine calibration tasks or using systematic approaches, e.g., forming the gradients of the cost function (4.6) and using these vectors in a steepest-descent algorithm as discussed in [140], [91], [148] and [149].…”
Section: Engine Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 This can be accomplished using a purely experimental, or a partially model-based, approach [127], [165]. In both cases, the iterations can be performed using heuristics based on experience with previous engine calibration tasks or using systematic approaches, e.g., forming the gradients of the cost function (4.6) and using these vectors in a steepest-descent algorithm as discussed in [140], [91], [148] and [149].…”
Section: Engine Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the calculation of J = λ T y and the updates (6)- (8) are made in the vectorized form which can be efficiently and rapidly 4 handled by MATLAB [9]. The user is provided with several options to trade-off available RAM versus the speed of computations.…”
Section: Implementation Of Dynamic Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For conventional powertrain systems, such assessment can be successfully carried out with quasistatic optimization [1][2][3][4][5][6], which ignored the dynamics and focused on the static relations of the performance to control variables and design parameters. When the dynamics are dominant, such as for the engine cold start problem, dynamic optimization is still manageable when the time horizon is short [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common approach is to approximate a given dynamic vehicle driving cycle as a limited number of steady-state engine operating points, and to calibrate set points in these operating points with respect to engineering targets for the complete cycle. Early work based on this approach for gasoline engine applications can be found in Rao, Cohen, Tennant, and Van Voorhies (1979), Rishavy, Hamilton, Ayers, and Keane (1977) and early work for diesel engine applications in Schmitz, Oligschläger, and Eifles (1994). An advantage with this approach is that optimal set points for steady-state engine operation can be calculated from the engine speed and the injected fuel amount only.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%