2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering a morphogenetically active hydrogel for bioprinting of bioartificial tissue derived from human osteoblast-like SaOS-2 cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
134
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
134
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alginate has shown particular relevance as a bioink due to its compatibility with cells, ease in forming cross-linked hydrogels, and the ability to control biodegradation. Khalil and Sun demonstrate bioprinting of 3D tissue constructs using alginate and endothelial cells [117] and alginate stabilized with gelatin was a suitable matrix for 3D bioprinting of bone-related SaOS-2 cells [118,119]. Common to these reports is a high (>80%) cell viability following bioprinting.…”
Section: 3d Cell Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alginate has shown particular relevance as a bioink due to its compatibility with cells, ease in forming cross-linked hydrogels, and the ability to control biodegradation. Khalil and Sun demonstrate bioprinting of 3D tissue constructs using alginate and endothelial cells [117] and alginate stabilized with gelatin was a suitable matrix for 3D bioprinting of bone-related SaOS-2 cells [118,119]. Common to these reports is a high (>80%) cell viability following bioprinting.…”
Section: 3d Cell Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frequently used bio‐inks such as gelatin,5 alginate,6 gelatin/alginate,4 gelatin/alginate/chitosan,3 and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) dimethacrylate/gelatin7 that have been used in the fabrication of cell‐laden scaffolds have shown high biocompatibility for cell viability in bone repair. However, they lack osteogenic capability to promote cell differentiation and new bone formation in the absence of growth factors, which represents a clear limitation for their successful application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has already been used by several groups to assess the mechanical properties of tissues and cells. 11,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] Furthermore, in 2013, we have demonstrated that the ferrule-top probes used for indentation can be modi¯ed to host another optical ber that, connected with an OCT system, enables the user to look at how the subsurface features of a sample deform when the indenter is pushed into the sample. 39 Those studies have never been brought beyond a¯rst proof-of-concept, whose practical relevance in life sciences was very limited: the use of new fabrication techniques and materials lead to a reduction of the sti®ness of the cantilever by three orders of magnitude with respect to those initial studies, enabling measurements on biologicallyrelevant soft materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%