2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1462-9011(02)00047-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering and economic evaluation of gas recovery and utilization technologies at selected US mines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A good review of engineering and economic evaluation of gas recovery from mines using different boreholes is also given in Kirchgessner et al (2002).…”
Section: Modular Cmm Emission Prediction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A good review of engineering and economic evaluation of gas recovery from mines using different boreholes is also given in Kirchgessner et al (2002).…”
Section: Modular Cmm Emission Prediction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, coal mine methane drainage and utilization promotes mining safety, recovers methane resources, and reduces GHG emissions (Chen and Cheng 2015;Bibler et al 1998;ECE 2010;ESMAP 2007;Karacan et al 2011;Keim et al 2011;Tu and Chen 2002). Globally, CMM drainage and usage is attracting increasing attention in major coal-producing countries, such as the USA, Australia, and China (Bibler et al 1998;Kirchgessner et al 2002;Wang et al 2012;Yang 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most economic evaluations currently target CBM reserves at or above a proven level (Kirchgessner et al 2002;Robertson 2009;Zhang et al 2004;Wang et al 2004). A few scholars (Mu and Zhao 1996), who studied economic evaluation methods for the exploration phase, have recommended the use of adjusted conventional natural gas evaluation parameters to perform economic evaluations in resource-rich areas that have been explored only at a low level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%