Engineering change? The idea of ‘the scheme’ in African irrigation

Abstract

Engineering change? the idea of 'the scheme' in African irrigation Abstract Despite a growing recognition of the significance of farmer-led irrigation, externally engineered and induced schemes remain a popular model for irrigation development in sub-Saharan Africa. These have had a mixed record, and many have been widely critiqued. Nonetheless, schemes that were initiated under colonialism have been rehabilitated and new schemes are still being developed. This paper interrogates the continuing attraction of this model for irrigation, asking how and why it persists. Is the fact that engineering is so central to irrigation schemes another example of 'high modernism', as Scott might argue? Analysis of the history and current policy-making context of a new irrigation scheme in Malawi suggests a picture that is more complex, in which practical engineering considerations combine with narratives of modernisation and political imperatives to create momentum and lock-in. Understanding this, and why lessons from the past inadequately shape future-directed planning requires interrogation of the positionality of those involved, including state, donors and private sector actors and the political, economic and discursive fields in which they operate.

Security in flexibility: accessing land and water for irrigation in Kenya’s changing rural environment

“…This farming system that includes land, water, technology, partnerships and markets is highly dynamic in space and time. These findings resonate with farmer-led irrigation literature that deviates from conceptualising irrigation as schemes, comanaged by farmers and (non-)governmental agencies (Woodhouse et al, 2017;Harrison, 2018). This case also clearly positions farmers, tajiris and land owners as agents of irrigation development, rather than 'beneficiaries' (Woodhouse et al, 2017).…”

Exploring the factors causing the poor performance of most irrigation schemes in post-independence sub-Saharan Africa

“…Two types of small government schemes were developed: expanded and upgraded existing AWM systems; and new schemes with social objectives such as resettlement and subsistence food production. The latter were on newly cleared land, often with poor soils and in remote locations (Harrison, 2018). Most of these schemes struggled, as viability in irrigation schemes with a subsistence orientation but no subsidies is an oxymoron; farmers could not pay irrigation fees or buy inputs if they ate what they produced.…”

Factors influencing Adoption of Irrigation Technologies among Smallholder Farmers in Machakos County, Kenya

“…Despite sustained donor support, huge technical and economic potentials of irrigation, adoption rates of irrigation technologies are still low, and the situation of the most vulnerable people and communities in terms of food insecurity has not improved (Harrison, 2018). Because cultivatable land is scarce, agricultural production must be expanded to boost yields and provide economic development, food security, and poverty reduction (Nakawuka et al, 2018).…”