2016
DOI: 10.1080/13621025.2016.1229194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering community spirit: the pre-figurative politics of affective citizenship in Dutch local governance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
25
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings indicate that participants' engagement in AFT simultaneously elicits hybrid forms of belonging to both homeland and receiving communities. This is evident in, for example, the way AFT participants liken their affective experience of the event to gezelligheid (sociability) that is a central aspect of Dutch culture (de Wilde and Duyvendak 2016). For example, Dutch Somali volunteer Roble (male,20s) argues that 'here they can feel safe and they have never had this much gezelligheid in Somalia.…”
Section: Transnational Belongingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings indicate that participants' engagement in AFT simultaneously elicits hybrid forms of belonging to both homeland and receiving communities. This is evident in, for example, the way AFT participants liken their affective experience of the event to gezelligheid (sociability) that is a central aspect of Dutch culture (de Wilde and Duyvendak 2016). For example, Dutch Somali volunteer Roble (male,20s) argues that 'here they can feel safe and they have never had this much gezelligheid in Somalia.…”
Section: Transnational Belongingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through their interpellation of the body and the senses, food and games were also tools to get parents to start talking and interacting in other ways than those of a group discussion. These techniques play on mothers' domestic and child-rearing roles, rendering the discussion group a deeply gendered homely space (De Wilde and Duyvendak, 2016).…”
Section: Liberating Speech: Fun and Affectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schinkel and Van Houdt, 2010) and perspectives on state pedagogies (Clarke, 2005; Newman, 2010; Newman and Tonkens, 2011) to study how precisely the Dutch state teaches its citizens to feel certain ways about their precarious position. Conceptualisations of ‘affective citizenship’ (Muehlebach, 2012; De Wilde, 2015) have drawn attention to the ways in which government now mobilises affects such as a sense of belonging (Duyvendak, 2011; De Wilde and Duyvendak, 2016) and compassion with others (Berlant 2004, Muehlebach, 2011). Following Andrea Muehlebach, we understand affective labour as central to the ‘unwaged labour regime’ that relies on producing ‘good feeling’, and is ‘valued by the state and other social actors’ because it presumably contributes to fostering social cohesion (2011: 61–62).…”
Section: Governing Precarity Through Affectmentioning
confidence: 99%