Engineering Competence? An Interpretive Investigation of Engineering Students' Professional Formation

Abstract

a BACKGROUNDThere is growing evidence that engineering students' professional formation is shaped by the interplay of explicit learning activities and various influences from the wider educational context. The unintended outcomes of these processes, or Accidental Competencies, formed the lens for an empirical investigation of this social learning system. PURPOSE (HYPOTHESIS)The exploratory inquiry addressed the following research questions. What are influences that contribute to engineering students' professional formation? How does it occur and what are resulting competencies and incompetencies DESIGN/METHODData was collected internationally in focus groups with 67 students in their transition from university into professional practice. The students' accounts were analyzed qualitatively using the software NVivo7. From the iterative analysis based on a grounded theory approach, categories and subordinate clusters of influences, mechanisms, and outcomes emerged. RESULTSThe following three forms of representation provide an authentic view of the social learning system under investigation: (i) a contextual model of competency formation illustrates the complex nature of the learning processes; (ii) an overview of the coding structure presents seven competence clusters (Flexibility, Interaction, Plan, Professional Realities, Self, Social Context and Technical); and (iii) thick descriptions from the students' accounts trace three characteristics of the complex learning processes (compound influences, ambiguity of outcomes, context-dependent nature of learning outcomes). CONCLUSIONEngineering education is a complex system where a range of influences outside the realm of explicit instruction contribute to the development of students as professional engineers. This study provides an evidence-based framework to consider this complexity in reflective teaching practice and innovative curriculum design.

Defining the Industrial and Engineering Management Professional Profile: a longitudinal study based on job advertisements

“…The formation of engineering students must consider what the professional practice is requiring, in order to bridge a gap between competences that universities are providing and competences that societies, industries and services are demanding, as described in several studies (Biesma et al, 2008;Heijde & Van Der Heijden, 2006;Hennemann & Liefner, 2010;Jackson, 2012;Marie-Emmanuelle et al, 2010;Markes, 2006;Mason et al, 2009;Stiwne & Jungert, 2010;Walther et al, 2011). In order to reduce this gap, the learning process requires innovative approaches contributing for the development of competences.…”

Becoming Boundary Spanning Engineers: Research Methods and Preliminary Findings

“…20 Still other studies have drawn attention to the disproportionate impact of internships on engineering students, including in terms of predicting increased retention in engineering degree programs, as a factor in career decision-making, and as a key mechanism for development of professional competence, to name a few salient themes. 21,22,23 Looking beyond the engineering education literature, one can also find engineers as subjects in broader studies of college-to-career transitions. 24 Andrew's accounts of his educational and work experiences also open a small but insightful window into professional engineering work, confirming what scholars of professional practice have been suggesting for quite some time, namely "that the social and technical are almost inextricably tied up together" 13 (p. 120).…”

Qualitative Analysis of Boundary-Spanning Implications within Interviews of Engagement Stakeholders

“…Utilizing the qualitative data analysis tool NVivo and the constant comparison method, the data was analyzed using an iterative analysis process as described in [17]. The coding was performed in two stages, topic coding, followed by interpretive coding.…”