2019
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering Drought Resistance in Forest Trees

Abstract: Climatic stresses limit plant growth and productivity. In the past decade, tree improvement programs were mainly focused on yield but it is obvious that enhanced stress resistance is also required. In this review we highlight important drought avoidance and tolerance mechanisms in forest trees. Genomes of economically important trees species with divergent resistance mechanisms can now be exploited to uncover the mechanistic basis of long-term drought adaptation at the whole plant level. Molecular tree physiol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
89
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 179 publications
(204 reference statements)
2
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, this QTL could be closely related to genes associated with growth response to drought stress. Key genes in drought tolerance and adaptation of plant model species (e.g., Arabidopsis thaliana, Populus) and other forest tree species (e.g., Pinus, Picea) have been reported in previous research (reviewed in [64]), and further research with similar approaches on C. japonica is essential to identify the same genes. Furthermore, identifying genes associated with drought stress is of importance for future forest management as climate change is expected to increase the frequency of extreme climatic events, such as drought and heatwaves [1].…”
Section: Climate Sensitivity Qtlsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Additionally, this QTL could be closely related to genes associated with growth response to drought stress. Key genes in drought tolerance and adaptation of plant model species (e.g., Arabidopsis thaliana, Populus) and other forest tree species (e.g., Pinus, Picea) have been reported in previous research (reviewed in [64]), and further research with similar approaches on C. japonica is essential to identify the same genes. Furthermore, identifying genes associated with drought stress is of importance for future forest management as climate change is expected to increase the frequency of extreme climatic events, such as drought and heatwaves [1].…”
Section: Climate Sensitivity Qtlsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The effects of drought on xylogenesis have been studied on several angiosperm species over the last decade. Poplar, in particular, was intensely studied [46,47]. Cambial cell layers are reduced under drought compared to well-watered plants [10,48].…”
Section: Drought Severely Changes Xylem Anatomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further functional analyses by forward and reverse genetic approaches are required to understand the acclimatory responses of trees to salt stress in more detail. While a number of candidate genes has already been studied for their involvement in enhancing salt tolerance in leaves or roots [47], systematic genetic studies targeting at enhanced xylem salt resistance are lacking.…”
Section: Salt Severely Affects Wood Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plant responses to water stress are a complex process that is controlled by multiplex regulatory events involving signaling, ion transport, and transcription regulation to control cell turgor loss, increase in solute concentration, reduction of relative water content, and cell membranes shrinkage, which alters interactions with the cytoskeleton and cell wall (Haswell & Verslues, 2015). In response to soil dehydration, concentration of endogenous abscisic acid (ABA) progressively increases activating a cascade of physiological responses, including stomatal closure, one of the earliest plant responses (Osakabe, Shinozaki, & Tran, 2014; Polle, Chen, Eckert, & Harfouche, 2019). This compound is produced in stressed roots and transported to leaves to regulate stomatal aperture (Schachtman & Goodger, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%