2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.03.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering ecological protection against landslides in diverse mountain forests: Choosing cohesion models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
109
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
9
109
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A slope stability analysis may be used to evaluate an existing condition or a proposed solution to determine if it meets the requirement of safety (Wu 1995;Mao et al 2012). In this research slope stability was investigated by changing the slope gradients between 10 and 45° (the range of slope in the whole study area) and the thickness of the sliding mass of 1 and 2 m (as mentioned in previous sections most of the critical failure planes in the study area are 1-2 m).…”
Section: Slope Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A slope stability analysis may be used to evaluate an existing condition or a proposed solution to determine if it meets the requirement of safety (Wu 1995;Mao et al 2012). In this research slope stability was investigated by changing the slope gradients between 10 and 45° (the range of slope in the whole study area) and the thickness of the sliding mass of 1 and 2 m (as mentioned in previous sections most of the critical failure planes in the study area are 1-2 m).…”
Section: Slope Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Past experiences show that slopes under vegetation are stable and more resistant to erosion (Gray, Sotir 1996;Genet et al 2008;Mao et al 2012). Natural slopes (like mountain forests) have usually been formed over long periods of time and each change (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These affects are closely related to root number, root diameter, root shape (architecture), root strength, and root-soil interaction (Wu et al 1979;Stokes et al 1996;Dupuy et al 2007;Mickovski et al 2007;Reubens et al 2007). Indeed, studies show that structure-related root factors such as root density (RD), root length density (RLD), root area ratio (RAR), number of roots, maximum root depth and branching pattern are likely to exert a greater impact upon hillslope stability than factors such as root tensile strength (Reubens et al 2007;Genet et al 2005;Fattet et al 2011;Mao et al 2012;PollenBankhead et al 2009). …”
Section: Note: Number Of Samples (N) Is 20mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil strength is influenced by the extent and length of roots within the root-soil composite (e.g. Operstein and Frydman 2000;Nilaweera and Nutalaya 1999;Yang and Shi 2002;Yang et al 1996;Mickovski and van Beek 2009;Loades et al 2010) as well as the effect of root area ratio (RAR) (PollenBankhead et al 2009(PollenBankhead et al , 2010Mao et al 2012). Mechanical effects of root systems affect the pullout resistance and pull-out strength of root systems, tensile resistance and tensile strength of single roots, and shear resistance and shear strength of single roots (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the results of direct investigations (Docker and Hubble, 2008;Pollen and Simon, 2005) indicate, using the Wu/Waldron model usually leads to overestimation of the influence of plant root systems on soil shear strength. Therefore, in recent years, the range of root cohesion has been determined using fiber bundle models (Pollen and Simon, 2005;Mao et al, 2012;Schwarz et al, 2012;. These models assume irregular mobilization of maximum tensile strengths in individual parts of the root bundle, but these models differ in assumptions concerning the manner of distribution of root tensile strengths and root elasticity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%