2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2020.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering Escherichia coli for methanol-dependent growth on glucose for metabolite production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Δ frmA Δ fbp and Δ frmA Δ tpiA strains described here depend on methanol for growth and maintain the potential to rely exclusively on methanol as the carbon and energy source. Especially the for a long-term evolution promising strain Δ frmA Δ tpiA shows significant methanol incorporation into RuMP cycle intermediates that exceeds previously reported strains under steady-state conditions 21 , 22 , 28 , 29 . A future long-term evolution with the Δ frmA Δ tpiA or any of the other strains predicted here is a highly promising strategy to achieve exclusive growth on methanol and represents an important step towards a biotechnologically applicable methanol to product conversion.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The Δ frmA Δ fbp and Δ frmA Δ tpiA strains described here depend on methanol for growth and maintain the potential to rely exclusively on methanol as the carbon and energy source. Especially the for a long-term evolution promising strain Δ frmA Δ tpiA shows significant methanol incorporation into RuMP cycle intermediates that exceeds previously reported strains under steady-state conditions 21 , 22 , 28 , 29 . A future long-term evolution with the Δ frmA Δ tpiA or any of the other strains predicted here is a highly promising strategy to achieve exclusive growth on methanol and represents an important step towards a biotechnologically applicable methanol to product conversion.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…1b), and can thus evolve in a methanol co-substrate growth regime. This excluded metabolic makeups 21,22,28,29 that lacked the potential for pure methylotrophic growth due to a compromised RuMP cycle (Fig. 1c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These plasmids are compatible with pUD9 and were transformed into E. coli BW25113 ΔfrmA containing pUD9 to generate dual-plasmid strains. The deletion of frmA (formaldehyde dehydrogenase) has previously been shown to improve 13 C-methanol assimilation by eliminating complete formaldehyde oxidation to CO 2 , thus conserving formaldehyde carbon for assimilation via the synthetic RuMP pathway (Muller et al, 2015;Whitaker et al, 2017), and we have routinely used E. coli BW25113 strains in our lab for synthetic methylotrophy (Bennett, Dillon, et al, 2020;Bennett, Gonzalez, et al, 2018;Gonzalez et al, 2018;Rohlhill et al, 2020;Whitaker et al, 2017 Figure 3a). We hypothesized that by channeling methanol-carbon flux through E4P and PEP toward tryptophan, the cells would experience improved 13 C-methanol assimilation in the upper central carbon metabolism (i.e., glycolysis and PPP), which we also hypothesized would improve the production of Ru5P, an essential intermediate for methanol utilization when using the RuMP pathway (Bennett, Gonzalez, et al, 2018).…”
Section: Overexpression Of Dysregulated Amino Acid Biosynthetic Opementioning
confidence: 99%