“…Due to these similarities, CyrTx-1a may share the same binding site on TTX-sensitive Na V channels as the one determined by mutational analysis and in silico docking for HnTx-IV, HwTx-IV, and GpTx-1a (Cai et al, 2015;Minassian et al, 2013;Murray et al, 2016). Indeed, positively charged amino acids Lys 25 , His 26 , Lys 27 , and Lys 30 , surrounded by hydrophobic Phe 5 and Trp 28 clustered on one toxin face may be involved in interactions with negatively charged Glu 753 , Glu 811 , Asp 816 , and Glu 818 or aliphatic residues (Met 750 ) located in S1-S2 and S3-S4 loops of DII domain of TTX-sensitive Na V channels (Klint et al, 2014;Li et al, 2004;Liu et al, 2012;Xiao et al, 2008;Xiao, Blumenthal, Jackson, Liang, & Cummins, 2010 From this point of view and compared to toxins belonging to the NaSpTx family 1 such as HnTx-I, HnTx-III, Hd1a, HnTx-IV, ProTx-III, Cm1a, GpTx-1, and HwTx-IV previously reported to interact with this subtype, CyrTx-1a is thus among the most efficient peptides (Cardoso et al, 2015;Klint et al, 2014;Klint et al, 2015;Liu et al, 2012;Liu et al, 2013;Murray et al, 2015;Murray et al, 2016;Shcherbatko et al, 2016;Xiao et al, 2008). In addition to hNa V 1.7 channels, CyrTx-1a was also shown to be highly potent to block the TTX-S hNa V 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, and 1.6 channels with the following increasing order for mean IC 50 values (between approximately 75 and 300 nM):…”