'Engineering Humour': Masculinity, Joking and Conflict in Shop-floor Relations

Abstract

The focus of this paper is on the organizational significance of shop-floor humour and in particular its relationship to gender identity and working-class resistance. A brief review of the literature on organizational humour is followed by a more detailed examination of the illuminating analysis by Willis of school/shop-floor counter-culture. Although his research provides a strong basis for the case study presented below, it is criticized for a tendency to romanticize working-class culture, humour and informal opposition. In contrast, by means of an empirical analysis of joking forms in the components division of a lorry producing factory, the paper then explores not only the collective elements, but also the internal divisions and contradictions that characterize shop-floor relations. By critically questioning the workers' manifest search to secure a highly masculine sense of identity, the paper is able to highlight a 'darker side' of shop-floor culture, which underpins and ultimately undermines the creative humour and collectivity found in the factory.

Men in nursing: Re-evaluating masculinities, re-evaluating gender

“…All their vulnerable, empathic, caring emotions which they show from birth until we push it out of them, get repressed and pushed down as a result of being teased or shamed" (Pollack, 1995: 42). Boys' training in masculinity is explicitly antiempathic, as Eder (1995) found in her study of boys' teasing in middle school and as Collinson (1995) discusses in his observations of working-class men's joking on the job. Beneke (1997: 41) asserts that modern manhood requires resisting empathy with those weaker or in pain, remaining 'cold-blooded when confronting suffering or horror".…”

Quotas for Men: Reframing Gender Quotas as a Means of Improving Representation for All

“…Research on masculinities and organizational culture indicates that male-dominated environments can be intimidating for men as well as women, with men compelled to perform a certain type of masculinity in order to conform to the dominant culture, even when this does not come naturally (Collinson 1988;Collinson and Hearn 2005;Kanter 1977). Increasing the presence of women may help to improve the behavior of male deputies and foster a working environment that is more respectful.…”

The abolition of the General Teaching Council for England and the future of teacher discipline

“…From a wider sociological point of view, these categorisations can perhaps be more appropriately considered organisational misbehaviour (Vardi and Weitz, 2004;Ackroyd and Thompson, 1999) and therefore more closely aligned to misconduct. From a more critical perspective, such behaviours could also be interpreted within the dialectic of control and resistance (Mumby, 2005): failure to follow policies could well be an example of routine resistance (Scott, 1985;Collinson, 1988;Prasad and Prasad, 1998;Fleming and Sewell, 2002) in a managerialist workplace. The point is that under the reforms such issues will be in the hands of headteachers rather than considered by an independent panel of peers.…”