2023
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.2c11844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering Multilevel Collaborative Catalytic Interfaces with Multifunctional Iron Sites Enabling High-Performance Real Seawater Splitting

Abstract: Given the abundant reserves of seawater and the scarcity of freshwater, real seawater electrolysis is a more economically appealing technology for hydrogen production relative to orthodox freshwater electrolysis. However, this technology is greatly precluded by the undesirable chlorine oxidation reaction and severe chloride corrosion at the anode, further restricting the catalytic efficiency of overall seawater splitting. Herein, a feasible strategy by engineering multifunctional collaborative catalytic interf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Fe 2p fine spectrum of Co3Fe in Figure c displays two series of peaks situated at binding energies of 711.57 eV (Fe 2p 3/2 ), 724.1 eV (Fe 2p 1/2 ) and 714.02 eV (Fe 2p 3/2 ), 727.49 eV (Fe 2p 1/2 ), corresponding to Fe 2+ and Fe 3+ , respectively. Similarly, peaks with binding energies of 707.28 and 720.08 eV can be assigned to Fe–P. , Two sets of satellite peaks of Fe 2p are located at 717.09 and 731.3 eV. Then, the P 2p spectrum of Co3Fe exhibits two weak peaks at 129.7 eV (P 2p 3/2 ) and 130.6 eV (P 2p 1/2 ), which are attributed to P bonded with Co and Fe, respectively (Figure d).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Fe 2p fine spectrum of Co3Fe in Figure c displays two series of peaks situated at binding energies of 711.57 eV (Fe 2p 3/2 ), 724.1 eV (Fe 2p 1/2 ) and 714.02 eV (Fe 2p 3/2 ), 727.49 eV (Fe 2p 1/2 ), corresponding to Fe 2+ and Fe 3+ , respectively. Similarly, peaks with binding energies of 707.28 and 720.08 eV can be assigned to Fe–P. , Two sets of satellite peaks of Fe 2p are located at 717.09 and 731.3 eV. Then, the P 2p spectrum of Co3Fe exhibits two weak peaks at 129.7 eV (P 2p 3/2 ) and 130.6 eV (P 2p 1/2 ), which are attributed to P bonded with Co and Fe, respectively (Figure d).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Similarly, peaks with binding energies of 707.28 and 720.08 eV can be assigned to Fe−P. 40,41 Two sets of satellite peaks of Fe 2p are located at 717.09 and 731.3 eV. Then, the P 2p spectrum of Co3Fe exhibits two weak peaks at 129.7 eV (P 2p 3/2 ) and 130.6 eV (P 2p 1/2 ), which are attributed to P bonded with Co and Fe, respectively (Figure 3d).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electrochemically active surface areas of the catalysts were investigated on the basis of C dl measurements. 49,50 Fig. 5d shows the C dl values of different M–S 2 /NF catalysts, calculated from the CV curves across the non-faradaic region at different sweep rates (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[33] In Figure 4 (b), the diffraction peak at 853.4 eV and 870.7 eV corresponds to the Ni 2p 3/2 peak and Ni 2p 1/2 peak formed by the spin-orbit splitting of Ni 2p with phosphorus in the form of chemical bonds, which can be attributed to the Ni-P bond. [34] Because it is significantly higher ChemistrySelect than the 852.8 eV of nickel, it can be inferred that there are more positive charges on Ni after binding. Additionally, the diffraction peaks at 861.6 eV and 879.0 eV are the satellite characteristic peak of Ni 2p splitting.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%