“…However,w en oted that isolated product yields were somewhat lower than anticipatedw hen compared to the complementaryr eactions using the P. leiognathi 2,6SiaT, [19,20] particularly when using only stoichiometric quantitieso fCTP.F or example, upon transfer of the parent Neu5Acalimiting maximum yield of 84 %r esulted for the labelled GM3, whereas the corresponding a2,6-sialylated trisaccharide had been obtained in 93 %y ield. [20] Likewise, the synthesis of unlabeled GM3 trisaccharide from lactose by 2,3SiaT pph catalysis proceeded with an incomplete yield of 86 %o nly.T his indicated that the 2,3-sialyltransfer was sufferingf rom ah ydrolytic uncoupling that was partially causing an unproductive consumptiono ft he limiting CTP quantity.I ndeed, many other 2,3SiaT and 2,6SiaTenzymes from the GT80 familyh ave been shown to display multifunctionality:B esides the desired sialyltransfer activity (A), promiscuous activitiess uch as CMP-Neu5Ac hydrolase (B;s ialyltransfer to water or phosphodiester hydrolysis) and sialidase (C,h ydrolytic cleavage of sialoside linkages) have been recorded (Scheme 2). [21,[24][25][26][27][28][29] Reversibility of sialyltransfer (A)w as recognized as the cause of ap urported trans-sialidase activity,w hich arises from transientC MP-Neu5Ac formation.…”