In many of my editorials over the past few years, I have discussed looking ahead, keying in on where we want to go and not being distracted by what might be in our way. This laser-like focus is important for achieving our goals, but we also need to be aware of what is around us. Things on the periphery of our awareness are often discounted. To justify focusing only on what is in our consciousness, we deem other things as unimportant, or worse, "soft" (as in the dreaded term "soft skills"). But if we simply stay in our lane and do not stop to consider our surroundings, there is much that we will miss. And much of what we are ignoring truly needs our attention.Who and what are on the periphery of the engineering education community? What contexts and issues are we not paying attention to? JEE is the voice of the engineering education community. We make choices about what is important or relevant, and we let those things into our consciousness-we publish them. How do we make those choices? Speaking on behalf of JEE, I can point to a scope, a mission, author guidelines, review criteria, and editorial processes (Journal of Engineering Education, 2021a, 2021b, 2021c) we use to evaluate scholarship that is submitted to the journal. As a community, we are bound to upholding these criteria and processes, but we are not bound by them. It is up to us as a community of peers to communicate what we identify as important and to decide how to include voices, topics, and methods that have historically been on the periphery.The idea of peripheral vision captures much of the content of this issue of JEE, starting with a guest editorial by James Holly, Jr., and Stephanie Masta on how critical race theory (CRT) can bring into focus what has historically been on the periphery of our consciousness: Whiteness in engineering education. These authors highlight the relevance of CRT for engineering education as we move beyond just documenting and understanding the reality of racism in engineering education and take action to dismantle White supremacy in our midst.The work included in this issue-the guest editorial, original articles, and research reviews-can open conversations about populations and topics on the periphery in different ways. Populations in focus in this issue include children with disabilities (Gold et al., 2021), female high school students (Carnemolla & Galea, 2021), makers in the Navajo Nation (Frank et al., 2021), diverse engineering students in a mentoring program (Washington & Mondisa, 2021), traditionally underserved graduate students (Kirn et al., 2021), and Black children (London et al., 2021). Topics that pull the margins in toward the center include professional shame (Secules et al., 2021) and assessing programs designed to broaden participation in engineering (Holloman et al., 2021). Other important works presented in this issue provide insight on processes that shape experiences within our community: assessing engineering identity formation (Li et al., 2021), students' leadership development (Wolfinbarger et a...