2002
DOI: 10.1038/nbt732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering soluble proteins for structural genomics

Abstract: Structural genomics has the ambitious goal of delivering three-dimensional structural information on a genome-wide scale. Yet only a small fraction of natural proteins are suitable for structure determination because of bottlenecks such as poor expression, aggregation, and misfolding of proteins, and difficulties in solubilization and crystallization. We propose to overcome these bottlenecks by producing soluble, highly expressed proteins that are derived from and closely related to their natural homologs. Her… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
129
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
129
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning the engineering of enzymes toward novel desired properties, like altered substrate specificity and improved activity, solubility, and stability; researchers have relied on the use of rational design and/or directed-evolution methods in combination with appropriate screening and selection procedures (1,10,11,22). For instance, various mutagenesis procedures and subsequent screening via assays that report on the successful folding of a protein of interest (9, 32, 45) have been used to engineer protein variants exhibiting improved solubility (35,37,46). Despite the obvious success of using such folding reporters in solubility/folding engineering projects, there is a risk that the engineered protein may lose its inherent activity since these screening procedures in general do not select for retained activity but only improved solubility/folding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the engineering of enzymes toward novel desired properties, like altered substrate specificity and improved activity, solubility, and stability; researchers have relied on the use of rational design and/or directed-evolution methods in combination with appropriate screening and selection procedures (1,10,11,22). For instance, various mutagenesis procedures and subsequent screening via assays that report on the successful folding of a protein of interest (9, 32, 45) have been used to engineer protein variants exhibiting improved solubility (35,37,46). Despite the obvious success of using such folding reporters in solubility/folding engineering projects, there is a risk that the engineered protein may lose its inherent activity since these screening procedures in general do not select for retained activity but only improved solubility/folding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To tackle these complications attributed by E. coli expressions system number of animal and plant expression system have designed [37,38]. Though these engineered expression system have made significant contribution for expression of eukaryotic proteins often failed in E. coli system but again failed to design the simple and efficient, high-yield, low-cost methods which can be used for the production of proteins in large amount [39].…”
Section: Complications With Conventional Expression Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6][7] Proteins expressed as inclusion bodies were denatured, purified, and refolded to yield soluble forms. 8,9 Several proteins showed enhanced solubility and long-term stability by simultaneous addition of charged amino acids L-Arg and L-Glu at 50 mM to the buffer, which increased the maximal concentration up to 8.7 times.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%