Engineering student perceptions of social justice in a feedback control systems course

Abstract

Background Although engineering practice occurs in social contexts, such contexts often remain obscure in engineering education. Since engineering sciences courses are crucial in shaping engineering students' knowledge and conceptions of problem‐solving in engineering, students in both an augmented and a traditional section of a feedback control systems course were interviewed to explore perceptions of the social justice dimensions of engineering. Purpose This study sought to understand student perceptions of social justice in the context of control systems courses. Design/Method This study used a qualitative, case study methodology. Inductive analysis was used to analyze focus groups and interviews conducted over 3 years. Findings Through inductive analysis, we identified three primary interrelated domains: (1) varied descriptions of social justice emerged, (2) diverse perceptions surfaced on how the social and technical dimensions of engineering problems interrelate, and (3) students' conceptions of engineers yielded insight into their perspectives on social justice. Conclusions That students did not vary substantively in perceptions of social justice across course sections suggests that prior knowledge of social justice shaped student perceptions. The findings also indicate that what students value shapes what they are learning and that student perceptions were informed by students' understanding of ethics and of engineering ideologies. These findings imply a need for distributed curricular integration of social justice concepts and for presenting social justice in the context of engineering problem‐solving. Such presentation could reinforce sociotechnical considerations inherent in engineering practice, clearly rendering visible inherent social justice considerations in engineering problems.

Analyzing Sustainability Awareness and Professional Ethics of Civil Engineering Bachelor’s Degree Students

“…Different methodologies could be applied to analyze academic programs, such as interviews with students, academic stuff or other actors involved in the curriculum [23], as well as in-depth analysis of the curriculum [24]. Navarro et al [25] suggested using the consistency value calculated with the AHP technique [26] to assess the critical thinking of master's degree students.…”

Learning and Growth in an Inclusive Engineering and Design Course

“…Leydens, Lucena, and colleagues (Leydens & Lucena, 2014; 2018; Leydens et al, 2021) have introduced principles for humanitarian engineering, service learning, and social justice via the “Engineering for Social Justice (E4SJ)” framework. Students are taught about the social contexts of engineering and design, sociotechnical systems, and the agency of engineers, designers, and stakeholders in creating just or unjust outcomes.…”

“…Students are taught about the social contexts of engineering and design, sociotechnical systems, and the agency of engineers, designers, and stakeholders in creating just or unjust outcomes. Leydens et al (2021) argue that “students are more likely to value social justice concepts when they are presented within the context of—and as highly relevant to—solving engineering problems,” and that “faculty should acknowledge that social justice considerations are already inherent in such problems, both in their formulations and solutions” (p. 741).…”

Sociotechnical Undergraduate Education for the Future of Natural Resource Production

“…The future of mining and other natural resource industries will require engineers who can take a sociotechnical approach to the challenges they face and the decisions they make in their working lives. The term sociotechnical recognizes that issues that appear to be technical in nature have an inherent social dimension [1][2][3]. For example, the coming energy transition will require massive amounts of minerals and metals, from the copper and iron necessary for power generation, transportation, and use, to the lithium, cobalt, and nickel required for electric vehicles.…”