2019
DOI: 10.29333/ejmste/106197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering Students’ Approaches to Learning and Views on Collaboration: How do both Evolve in a PBL Environment and What are their Contributing and Constraining Factors?

Abstract: Background: This study investigated the development of engineering students' approaches to learning and views on collaboration in a PBL environment. Material and methods: An explanatory mixed research approach was employed with participants from four PBL-implementing engineering courses in Qatar and China. 197students responded to two surveys, and 168 students participated in group interviews. Results: While the study reveals increased adoption of deep approaches to learning on team projects, little influence … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Significant differences were identified regarding pedagogical mode as a demographic factor, with PBL course students reporting higher readiness than non-PBL students in total and in two of the four factors. This result further evidence of PBL's impact on students' self-efficacy and motivation (Du, Ebead, Sabah, Ma, & Naji, 2019;Du, Naji, Sabah, & Ebead, 2020;Naji, Ebead, Al-Ali, & Du, 2020). The results are also aligned with suggestions from previous studies that teaching methods that highlight active, interactive, and collaborative learning better support students' selfdirected learning online (Chu & Tsai, 2009;Stewart, 2007;Yang & Tsai, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Significant differences were identified regarding pedagogical mode as a demographic factor, with PBL course students reporting higher readiness than non-PBL students in total and in two of the four factors. This result further evidence of PBL's impact on students' self-efficacy and motivation (Du, Ebead, Sabah, Ma, & Naji, 2019;Du, Naji, Sabah, & Ebead, 2020;Naji, Ebead, Al-Ali, & Du, 2020). The results are also aligned with suggestions from previous studies that teaching methods that highlight active, interactive, and collaborative learning better support students' selfdirected learning online (Chu & Tsai, 2009;Stewart, 2007;Yang & Tsai, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In the College of Engineering, problem and project-based learning (PBL) was recently introduced in the teaching practice of some courses. While a few studies presented positive results of engineering students' learning experiences in a PBL environment (Du, Ebead, Sabah, Ma, & Naji, 2019;Du, Naji, Sabah, & Ebead, 2020;Naji, Ebead, Al-Ali, & Du, 2020), further educational and research attention to the effect of PBL implementation is needed (Chen, Kolmos, & Du, 2020). In this study, we hypothesized that students who have been learning in a 5 / 17 PBL environment may report different online learning experiences than students whose courses mainly focus on lectures.…”
Section: Research Context and Designmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Although transitioning a whole program and institution to PBL at a systemic level is ideal to maximize student learning (Kolmos, 2017), in reality, institutional movement to PBL initially takes place at the course level, based on the instructors' interests and initiation (Du, Ebead, Sabah, Ma, & Naji, 2019;Du, Naji, Sabah, & Ebead, 2020). The extent to which the instructor may restructure and adjust the course to PBL is highly related to instructor-and student-based factors including their prior experiences, beliefs, motivation, and PBL-related skills, as well as socio-cultural factors such as institutional culture, support, policy, curricula conditions and physical facilities, and the educational system (Du, Kolmos, Ahmed, Spliid, Lyngdorf, & Ruan, 2020;Van Barneveld & Strobel, 2011).…”
Section: / 16mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the majority of the PBL literature in civil engineering tends to be an account of practice from the instructors' perspective or course feedback from students (Shekhar & Borrego, 2017), a few very recent studies have reported empirical evidence of students' development of deep learning (Du, Ebead, Sabah, Ma, & Naji, 2019) and self-directed learning (Du, Naji, Sabah, & Ebead, 2020) through collaborative learning in project teams. Also is newly reported includes students' selfreported improvement in professional skills for civil engineering, namely, communication, problem-solving, use of modern technological tools, teamwork and leadership (Hezmi et al, 2017).…”
Section: Pbl In Civil and Structural Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation