2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.06.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering the cellular mechanical microenvironment to regulate stem cell chondrogenesis: Insights from a microgel model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In spite of the capability of hydrogels to mimic the extracellular matrix (ECM), their large size (i.e., low surface to volume ratio resulting in small diffusion area and long diffusion distance for soluble molecules) could hinder the uniform distribution of biophysical cues/nutrients leading to a biochemical gradient within the microgels and thus impeding high-throughput screening and evaluation. In this respect, Feng and co-workers [ 87 ] proposed a microgel model (i.e., gelatin/HA microgels formed in microfluidic devices and exhibiting a low, medium and high degree of cross-linking) ( Figure 9 ) mimicking the ECM microenvironment to examine in vitro the effect of mechanical cues embedded in the cellular microenvironment on the fate of bone marrow derived MSCs (BMSCs). BMSCs cultured in hydrogel beads of low cross-linking density were shown to differentiate to hyaline cartilage as opposed to those cultured in microgels with medium and high cross-linking density, which differentiated towards fibrocartilage, thus verifying the effect of the mechanical microenvironment on the proliferation, distribution and differentiation of MSCs.…”
Section: Hydrogels—preclinical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In spite of the capability of hydrogels to mimic the extracellular matrix (ECM), their large size (i.e., low surface to volume ratio resulting in small diffusion area and long diffusion distance for soluble molecules) could hinder the uniform distribution of biophysical cues/nutrients leading to a biochemical gradient within the microgels and thus impeding high-throughput screening and evaluation. In this respect, Feng and co-workers [ 87 ] proposed a microgel model (i.e., gelatin/HA microgels formed in microfluidic devices and exhibiting a low, medium and high degree of cross-linking) ( Figure 9 ) mimicking the ECM microenvironment to examine in vitro the effect of mechanical cues embedded in the cellular microenvironment on the fate of bone marrow derived MSCs (BMSCs). BMSCs cultured in hydrogel beads of low cross-linking density were shown to differentiate to hyaline cartilage as opposed to those cultured in microgels with medium and high cross-linking density, which differentiated towards fibrocartilage, thus verifying the effect of the mechanical microenvironment on the proliferation, distribution and differentiation of MSCs.…”
Section: Hydrogels—preclinical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Microfluidic fabrication and characterization of BMSC-laden gel-HA microgels: ( a ) effects of flow rate ratios of oil/water on the diameter of BMSC-laden gel-HA microgels; ( b ) BMSC viability and proliferation behaviors in gel-HA microgels (reprinted with the permission from [ 87 ]). …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wongpinyochit et al [95] injected SF solution and organic solvent into two separate microfluidic channels, and then these two phases met and mixed at the junction, inducing the selfassembly of SF spheres. Microfluidic mixing was proved to not only allow the sphere size to be tuned by varying the flow Gelatin [116] Microsphere Physical crosslinking --Gelatin [117] Microsphere Enzymatic crosslinking --Gel-SH [119] Microsphere Chemical crosslinking BMSCs Cell BP-grafted GelMA [121] Microsphere Photo-crosslinking --…”
Section: Sfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the amino and carbonyl groups of gelation make it easy to have chemical modification. For example, thiol-modified gelatin (Gel-SH) was synthesized and could be rapidly crosslinked with HA-VS via thiol-Michael addition reaction at room temperature [119]. Using Gel-SH and HA-VS as dispersed phases, respectively, Gel-SH microspheres had spontaneous crosslinking once the liquid phases met without additional external stimulation.…”
Section: Gelationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, such bulk hydrogels have merely nanoporous meshes inside the crosslinked network and lack of micropores, indicative of insufficient nutrient exchange and low cell viability inside hydrogels [ 8 , 9 ]. A promising solution to this problem is the replacement of bulk hydrogel with microporous microgel assembly (also called as microporous annealed particle, MAP), whose large surface/volume ratio and short diffusion distance enhance the mass transport of nutrients and thus promote the long-term survival of cells [ [10] , [11] , [12] ]. Moreover, its interconnected pores can also guide cell ingrowth and tissue formation before hydrogel degradation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%