2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2021.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering the interface between electroactive bacteria and electrodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior efforts to direct electroactive biofilm formation on surfaces have focused solely on engineering cell-electrode attachment, rather than patterning, through synthetic biology and materials engineering strategies. These works were based on either (I) enhancing biofilm formation by expressing adhesive appendages on cell surfaces 49,50 and increasing c-di-GMP levels 51,52 or (II) placing complementary chemical or DNA-based structures on substrates and cell surfaces to bond cells to electrodes [53][54][55][56][57] . Compared with these previous works, our strategy does not require electrode pretreatment for electroactive biofilm patterning and can generate robust biofilms with defined dimensions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior efforts to direct electroactive biofilm formation on surfaces have focused solely on engineering cell-electrode attachment, rather than patterning, through synthetic biology and materials engineering strategies. These works were based on either (I) enhancing biofilm formation by expressing adhesive appendages on cell surfaces 49,50 and increasing c-di-GMP levels 51,52 or (II) placing complementary chemical or DNA-based structures on substrates and cell surfaces to bond cells to electrodes [53][54][55][56][57] . Compared with these previous works, our strategy does not require electrode pretreatment for electroactive biofilm patterning and can generate robust biofilms with defined dimensions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the components of these systems become ever more complex and advanced, this interface becomes increasingly important. 9 Moreover, one consistent challenge in biosensing is the development of systems that can monitor biological signals without perturbing or changing the system of interest, which can cause artifacts in sensor signals and prevent the production of a biologically relevant readout. Thus, there is increasing interest in bioelectrochemical platforms based on functional assays and the behavior and activity of biomolecules rather than simply monitoring passive binding interactions.…”
Section: Functional Assays At the Abiotic–biotic Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“… 8 These platforms are also compatible with multiplexing, miniaturization, and automation. 9 Thus, electrochemical biosensors are highly useful for the study of host–pathogen interactions, as well as point-of-care detection of these pathogens. A number of recent reviews, most notably that of Ruiz de Eguilaz et al and Bukkitgar et al, have cataloged the advances in the methods and materials used for these sensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrogenic bacteria are a special group of microbes that can release their metabolically generated electrons extracellularly across the cell membrane to terminal acceptors, or acquire electrons from external donors. [1][2][3][4] The bacterial electron transfer to external acceptors is a remarkable and crucial process for their growth, respiration, communication, sensing, and cooperation with surrounding environments (Figure 1). [5,6] On the other hand, exogenous electrons can be transferred into intracellular compartments of bacterial cells, small MFC units has been proposed as an alternative solution for large-scale development, the performance has not noticeably improved because of intrinsic voltage reversal and mass transport limitations within the serially connected units.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9] The bidirectional electron transfer occurs via multiple adaptive routes such as direct electron transfer, nanowire transfer, and shuttle transfer, indicating that the electron transfer efficiency is the key factor affecting the microbial electrochemical activities. [2,5,10] With the discovery that external electrodes can effectively serve as electron acceptors or donors, the intensive exploration of bidirectional electron exchange between the bacteria and the electrodes has created novel techniques in various bioelectrochemical systems (e.g., microbial fuel cells (MFCs), microbial electrolysis cells (MECs), microbial desalination cells (MDCs), and microbial electrosynthesis (MES)). [1,11] With the bioelectrochemical systems, the electrogenic bacteria can revolutionarily generate renewable bioelectricity from organic waste, synthesize high-value chemicals and biofuels, or perform many other environmentally important functions, such as bioremediation, desalination, and biosensing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%