The Archaeology of Rock Art in Western Arnhem Land, Australia 2017
DOI: 10.22459/ta47.11.2017.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineers of the Arnhem Land plateau: Evidence for the origins and transformation of sheltered spaces at Nawarla Gabarnmang

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2). It exceeds unambiguous evidence for the use of symbols anywhere on the SCS arc by >20 ky. With one apparent exception (85), it exceeds the earliest age estimate for edge-ground axes in Sahul by 30 ky and in Eurasia by 27-35 ky (83,86,87). It precedes nearly all evidence for unifacial points and intensive seed processing in Sahul by 60 ky (88,89).…”
Section: Madjedbebementioning
confidence: 93%
“…2). It exceeds unambiguous evidence for the use of symbols anywhere on the SCS arc by >20 ky. With one apparent exception (85), it exceeds the earliest age estimate for edge-ground axes in Sahul by 30 ky and in Eurasia by 27-35 ky (83,86,87). It precedes nearly all evidence for unifacial points and intensive seed processing in Sahul by 60 ky (88,89).…”
Section: Madjedbebementioning
confidence: 93%
“…At three large rock shelter and rock art sites in Australia (Nawarla Gabarnmang: e.g., Delannoy et al 2017), Spain (La Garma: Arias and Ontañon 2012) and…”
Section: Archaeomorphology: a Question Of Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, pre-existing subterranean chambers and corridors were marked with piles of rock, sometimes to create underground pathways that demarcated appropriate means of passage, such as the placement of a stone step deep in a cavern at Chauvet Cave (e.g., Delannoy et al 2018). At Nawarla Gabarnmang, rock pillars and ceiling surfaces were manually removed, opening up the usable space and exposing new rock surfaces for painting Delannoy et al 2017). Such rock-workings from the deep past are sometimes easy to see, but often they are not, and require focused investigation of the spatial properties of both sites and objects.…”
Section: Archaeomorphology: a Question Of Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When was a site first used? Those beginnings are then positioned in broader sociogeographical settings, such as to investigate the spread of people across land and seascapes (e.g., for a story of global colonisation, see Gamble, 1994); the introduction of artefact types and technologies from one area to another (e.g., for the spread of Sudden and San Rafael Side‐notched points along the southern Rocky Mountains, USA, see David et al, 2005); when people started to modify the physical matrix of rock shelters (e.g., in Arnhem Land, Delannoy et al, 2017; in the Kimberley, Delannoy, David, Genuite, et al, 2020); or temporal trends in site and regional occupation (e.g., for increased intensities of site use in Late Holocene temperate Australia, see Lourandos, 1983). Rock shelters feature prominently in many such investigations, because their prominent physical demarcation and visibility in the landscape often signal enduring locales of human activity that span thousands of years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%