English deficiency and the native–immigrant wage gap

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your personal and scholarly purposes.You are not to copy documents for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. licence. www.econstor.eu If the documents have been made available under an Open Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated AbstractWe focus on the effect of English deficiency on the native-immigrant wage gap for employees in the UK using the first wave of the UK Household Longitudinal Survey (Understanding Society). We show that the wage gap is robust to controls for age, region of residence, educational attainment and ethnicity, particularly for men. However, English as Additional Language (EAL) is capable of explaining virtually all the remaining wage gap between natives and immigrants. Using the interaction of language of country of birth and age-at-arrival as instrument, we find strong evidence of a causal effect of EAL on the native-immigrant wage gap. raise the probability that an individual will self-select into the English proficient group. 3This causes a positive self-treatment. In addition, measurement error of the English proficiency variable causes yet another problem of endogeneity which induces a negative (attenuation) bias. Hence, the total endogeneity bias is a combination of the two aforementioned problems (see Dustmann and Fabbri 2003). We address the 'aggregate' endogeneity problem using an IV strategy, without making an attempt to disentangle the contribution of the two sources of bias. Following Chin (2004, 2010) and van Ours and Veenman (2006), we use language of the origin country as well as its interaction with age-at-arrival as instrumental variables for the subpopulation of immigrants. Our identification strategy effectively compares older and younger arrivers from non-English-speaking countries, after controlling for an age-at-arrival effect which is the same for all immigrants regardless of their native language. This identification strategy delivers a Local Average Treatment Effect (LATE) that is straightforward to interpret for the subpopulation of (first-generation) immigrants affected by the instrument and offers a suitable and meaningful control group. Hence, this is an improvement to alternative identification strategies that have ...

Financial Literacy and Mathematics: A Study among Young Mexican High School Students

“…For this analysis, the level of financial literacy will be given by the natural logarithm of the total sum of correct answers in the three components in the "OECD approach". This transformation was done based on the procedure of Miranda and Zhu (2013). It allows more variation in the dependent variable and avoids working with discrete numbers.…”

International Migration and the Economics of Language

“…Miranda and Zhu's (2013) IV estimates, which appear to be robust, indicate that the earnings differential could be as high as 25 percent.…”

“…Table 5 presents a summary of the findings described above on the effects of dominant language proficiency on the earnings of immigrants. Dustmann and Fabbri (2003), Miranda and Zhu (2013) United States…”

Language skills and labor market performance of immigrants in the Netherlands

“…The second variable is age at arrival in the host country, a well-established determinant of language skills of immigrants in earlier studies by Chin (2004, 2010) and Miranda and Zhu (2013b). Children who are exposed to a new language early are likely to have good language skills at adulthood.…”